Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39814428›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Effectiveness of low-dose amitriptyline and mirtazapine in patients with insomnia disorder and sleep maintenance problems: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in general practice (DREAMING).

Mette H Bakker, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg, Pierre M Bet, Jos Wr Twisk, Henriëtte E van der Horst, Pauline Slottje

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Sleep physiology and critical illness: A narrative review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mette H BakkerDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC); Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0003-0663-1981
Jacqueline G HugtenburgDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam jg.hugtenburg@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6098-2438
Pierre M BetDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0001-6735-7379
Jos Wr TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-1020
Henriëtte E van der HorstDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC); Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-4354
Pauline SlottjeDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC); Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-0011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-dose amitriptyline and mirtazapine are widely prescribed off-label for insomnia disorder. However, evidence of their effectiveness from placebo-controlled studies is lacking.

aimTo assess the effectiveness of low-dose mirtazapine and amitriptyline in patients with insomnia disorder. DESIGN AND

settingPragmatic, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial undertaken in general practices in the Amsterdam region, the Netherlands.

methodPatients (aged 18-85 years) with insomnia disorder and sleep maintenance problems for whom non-pharmacological treatment was insufficient were randomised to mirtazapine (7.5-15 mg/day), amitriptyline (10-20 mg/day), or placebo for 16 weeks (optional double-dose regimen in week 2-14). Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores (range 0-28) were assessed at baseline and again at 6, 12, 20, and 52 weeks. The primary outcome was an ISI total score at 6 weeks that was clinically relevant and signified either 'improvement' (>7 points lower than baseline) or 'recovery' (total score ≤10 points).

resultsIn total, 80 participants were included. At 6 weeks, in the intention-to-treat analyses, mirtazapine and amitriptyline each led to statistically significantly lower ISI scores when compared with placebo: mirtazapine mean difference = -6.0 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = -9.0 to -3.0), amitriptyline mean difference = -3.4 points (95% CI = -6.3 to -0.4). At 6 weeks mirtazapine resulted in statistically significantly higher improvement and recovery rates (52% and 56%, respectively) compared with placebo (both 14%), whereas amitriptyline (with rates of 40% and 36%, respectively) did not. From 12 weeks onwards no statistically significant differences in ISI scores were observed.

conclusionCompared with placebo, low-dose mirtazapine provided a statistically significant and clinically relevant reduction of insomnia severity at 6 weeks, but not at later time points. Low-dose amitriptyline resulted in a statistically significant reduction at 6 weeks, but this was not clinically relevant. The results do not support the prescription of low-dose amitriptyline and mirtazapine for several months in patients with insomnia disorder in general practice. Based on the results, GPs may consider prescribing off-label low-dose mirtazapine for a period of about 6 weeks in case non-pharmacological treatment is insufficient.

Indexed as

AmitriptylineAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicMianserinSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMirtazapineNetherlandsAmitriptylineAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicMianserinMirtazapineamitriptylineinsomniamirtazapineprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID39814428
PMCPMC12199994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.