Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39814393›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2025

Daily topical application of chlorhexidine gluconate to the skin in dogs and its impact on skin barriers and cytotoxicity.

Akira Matsuda, Yukari Nakamura, Takamasa Itoi, Kiyotaka Arai, Kenji Kutara, Keisuke Sugimoto, Noritaka Maeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Akira MatsudaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Ehime, Japan.
Yukari NakamuraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Ehime, Japan.
Takamasa ItoiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Ehime, Japan.
Kiyotaka AraiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Ehime, Japan.
Kenji KutaraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Ehime, Japan.
Keisuke SugimotoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Ehime, Japan.
Noritaka MaetaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Ehime, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the importance of using local disinfectants instead of systemic antibiotics for the treatment of infectious skin diseases to prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria has become widely recognized. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is commonly used in veterinary antibacterial shampoos; however, the daily topical application of diluted CHG solutions has also been adopted. Despite its widespread use, few studies have investigated the effects of CHG on the canine skin barrier. This study examined the skin barrier-damaging effects of CHG in dogs by applying diluted CHG (0.05%, 0.5%, and 4%) daily to six healthy dogs for 2 weeks. At the end of the trial, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin surface hydration (SSH), and number of skin bacteria were evaluated. Additionally, the cytotoxicity of CHG to the canine progenitor epidermal keratinocytes (CPEK) was examined using the water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-8) assay. Continuous application of 0.5% and 4% CHG to the skin led to a significant reduction in the number of skin bacteria. Additionally, at 4% CHG, a notable increase in TEWL and a decrease in SSH was observed. The WST assay revealed cytotoxicity of CHG at concentrations of 0.05%. In conclusion, although daily topical application of 4% CHG demonstrated the potential to disrupt the skin barrier, 0.5% CHG demonstrated sufficient antimicrobial activity without skin barrier disruption. Additionally, when treating dogs' skin with a compromised stratum corneum, use of lower concentration of CHG is suitable.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineSkinAdministration, TopicalAnimalsDogsFemaleKeratinocytesMaleWater Loss, InsensibleAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconatechlorhexidine gluconatedogskin barrierskin surface hydrationtransepidermal water loss

Identifiers

PMID39814393
PMCPMC11903347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.