ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2025
Early Childhood Vaccination Coverage and Patterns by Rural-Urban Commuting Area.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wastewater Surveillance to Track Resurgent Measles Outbreak, Ontario, Canada, 2025.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Defining Veteran Rurality: An Analysis of the U.S. Veterans Health Administration Rural-Urban Taxonomy.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Monitoring Infant Vaccination Timeliness and Patterns: Progress and Future Directions.Academic pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNational surveillance efforts have reported rural-urban disparities in childhood vaccination coverage by metropolitan statistical area designations, measured at the county level. This study's objective was to quantify vaccination trends using more discrete measures of coverage and rurality than prior work.
methodsSerial, cross-sectional analyses of National Immunization Survey-Child restricted-use data collected in 2015-2021 for U.S. children born 2014-2018 were conducted. ZIP code of residence was merged with rural-urban commuting area codes. Vaccination coverage and patterns, including on-time receipt of recommended vaccines, were assessed using vaccinations recorded from birth through age 23 months. To determine whether trends differed by rurality, an interaction between birth year and RUCA was tested in multivariable regression models. Analyses were conducted in November 2023-January 2024.
resultsIn nationally representative analyses of N=59,361 children, 87.7%, 7.1%, and 5.3% lived in urban, large rural, or small town/rural areas, respectively. Among children born in 2018, coverage for the combined 7-vaccine series was 71.2% (95% CI=69.6%, 72.9%) in urban, 64.9% (95% CI=58.8%, 71.0%) in large rural, and 62.6% (95% CI=56.2%, 68.9%) in small town/rural areas. There was a positive trend in on-time vaccination in urban areas (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] for birth year=1.06; 95% CI=1.05, 1.08). While the trend did not significantly differ for large rural versus urban areas (interaction aPR=1.02; 95% CI=0.96, 1.08), there was less improvement in on-time vaccination in small town/rural areas (interaction aPR=0.93; 95% CI=0.88, 0.99).
conclusionsIncreased efforts are needed to eliminate disparities in routine and on-time vaccination for rural children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.