Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39814028›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025

Opposite asymmetry in visual perception of humans and macaques.

Ekin Tünçok, Lynne Kiorpes, Marisa Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sensory reformatting for a working visual memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Asymmetries in Foveal Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Visual adaptation stronger at the horizontal than the vertical meridian: Linking performance with V1 cortical surface area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ekin TünçokDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Lynne KiorpesDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Marisa CarrascoDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. Electronic address: marisa.carrasco@nyu.edu.

Funding

Linking brain and behavior 'around' the visual fieldR01EY027401 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA, WINAWER, JONATHAN A · 2017 to 2025
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In human adults, visual perception varies throughout the visual field. Performance decreases with eccentricity

Indexed as

Macaca nemestrinaMotion PerceptionVisual FieldsVisual PerceptionAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adulthuman and non-human primatespolar angle asymmetriesvisual fieldvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID39814028
PMCPMC11817857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.