Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39814025›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2025

Detecting copy-number alterations from single-cell chromatin sequencing data by AtaCNA.

Xiaochen Wang, Zijie Jin, Yang Shi, Ruibin Xi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. FFPE-CUTAC: A Single Assay, Multiple Layers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaochen WangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Zijie JinPeking University International Cancer Institute, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yang ShiBeigene Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China.
Ruibin XiSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Center for Statistical Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Electronic address: ruibinxi@math.pku.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell assay of transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq) unbiasedly profiles genome-wide chromatin accessibility in single cells. In single-cell tumor studies, identification of normal cells or tumor clonal structures often relies on copy-number alterations (CNAs). However, CNA detection from scATAC-seq is difficult due to the high noise, sparsity, and confounding factors. Here, we describe AtaCNA, a computational algorithm that accurately detects high-resolution CNAs from scATAC-seq data. We benchmark AtaCNA using simulation and real data and find AtaCNA's superior performance. Analyses of 10 scATAC-seq datasets show that AtaCNA could effectively distinguish malignant from non-malignant cells. In glioblastoma, endometrial, and ovarian cancer samples, AtaCNA identifies subclones at distinct cellular states, suggesting an important interplay between genetic and epigenetic plasticity. Some tumor subclones only differ in small-scale (10-20 Mb) CNAs, demonstrating the importance of high-resolution CNA detection. These data show that AtaCNA can aid in integrative analysis to understand the complex heterogeneity in cancer.

Indexed as

ChromatinDNA Copy Number VariationsSingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsFemaleHumansNeoplasmsTransposasesChromatinTransposasesBayesian modelchange pointscopy-number alterationsCP: Cancer biologyCP: Geneticshigh resolutionnormalizationsingle-cell chromatin sequencingtumor cell detectiontumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID39814025
PMCPMC11840951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.