Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39813674›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Teaching in the Digital Age-Developing a Support Program for Nursing Education Providers: Design-Based Research.

Stefan Walzer, Carolin Barthel, Ronja Pazouki, Helga Marx, Sven Ziegler, Peter Koenig, Christiane Kugler, Stefan Jobst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefan Walzer *Care and Technology Lab, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen im Schwarzwald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8748-5244
Carolin Barthel *Institute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-4932-0617
Ronja PazoukiInstitute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-6412-7524
Helga MarxNursing Direction, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-6038-2831
Sven ZieglerNursing Direction, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1932-0787
Peter KoenigCare and Technology Lab, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen im Schwarzwald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4376-0304
Christiane KuglerInstitute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1422-2718
Stefan JobstInstitute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0160-2391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care systems and the nursing profession worldwide are being transformed by technology and digitalization. Nurses acquire digital competence through their own experience in daily practice, but also from education and training; nursing education providers thus play an important role. While nursing education providers have some level of digital competence, there is a need for ongoing training and support for them to develop more advanced skills and effectively integrate technology into their teaching.

objectiveThis study aims to develop a needs-based support program for nursing education providers to foster digital competencies and to test this intervention.

methodsWe used a design-based research approach, incorporating iterative development with expert consultation to create and evaluate a support program for nursing education providers. Focus groups were conducted online to assess needs, and thematic content analysis was used to derive key insights. The support program was then refined through expert feedback and subjected to a feasibility and satisfaction test, with participant evaluations analyzed descriptively.

resultsSix main categories emerged from the focus groups, highlighting key areas, including the use of digital technology, ongoing support needs, and the current state of digitalization in nursing education. The support program was developed based on these findings, with expert validation leading to adjustments in timing, content prioritization, and platform integration. Preliminary testing showed good overall satisfaction with the support program, although participants suggested improvements in content relevance and digital platform usability.

conclusionsAlthough the feasibility test showed high satisfaction with the support program, low participation rates and limited perceived knowledge gain were major concerns. The results suggest that while the program was well received, further refinements, including a focus on competency-based approaches and addressing workplace barriers, are needed to increase participation and effectiveness of such interventions. The findings of this research can be used as a basis for the development of similar programs in other educational and health care contexts.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyEducation, NursingTeachingAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing Education ResearchResearch Designcompetency-based approachdesign-based researchdigital agedigital competenciesdigital technologyexpert consultationfeasibility studyfeasibility testfocus grouphealth carehealth care digitalizationneeds assessmentnursenursing educationnursing education providerqualitative researchsatisfactionsupport programthematic content analysisworkplace barrier

Identifiers

PMID39813674
PMCPMC11780299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.