ReviewBlood advances2025
Current developments in T-cell receptor therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and challenges of TCR-T cell therapy for AML/MDS.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Minor histocompatibility antigen TCR-T.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Emerging frontiers in adoptive cell therapies: engineering innovations, current challenges, and manufacturing perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: The antibodies, TriKEs, and CARs on the arduous road to cure.Blood reviews · 2026Review
- Dual SYK-HDAC Inhibitor Elicits Striking Efficacy against Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Rational Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Human Cytomegalovirus Infection in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients and CAR T Cell Recipients - PART 1: Risk Factors, Clinical Impact and Immune Response.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- Article
- Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Immunological barriers and engineering strategies for CAR-T cell therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractT-cell receptor (TCR) therapies are a promising modality for the treatment of cancers, with significant efforts being directed toward acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a particularly challenging disease. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting single surface antigens have shown remarkable efficacy for B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. However, AML presents formidable obstacles to the effectiveness of CAR T cells because of the widespread expression of heterogenous leukemia immunophenotypes and surface antigen targets additionally present on normal myeloid cells. TCR therapies are an evolving field of cell therapies that allow targeting intracellular antigenic peptides presented via HLA molecules. The development of TCR therapy for AML is progressing rapidly through preclinical research and successful clinical trials. This review specifically explores the antigens targeted in AML, the diverse methodologies and strategies used in TCR identification, and preclinical TCR T-cell development. The review also discusses innovative molecular designs to improve functional efficacy, mitigate safety concerns, and overcome HLA restrictions. Specific outcomes of early clinical trials targeting important antigens Wilms tumor gene 1, preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma, and minor histocompatibility antigen HA-1 are also highlighted. Ultimately, this review underscores why TCR therapy is poised to become an indispensable component of AML immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.