ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Therapeutic itineraries shared by users of specialized mental health services: a cluster analysis].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental health interventions performed by nurses in Primary Health Care: analysis according to professional profile.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the existence of therapeutic itineraries shared by users of specialized mental health services in a medium-sized municipality. This is a cross-sectional study, carried out from August to November 2019 including 341 users of specialized mental health services in the municipality of Itatiba, São Paulo State, Brazil. To identify the itineraries, based on a set of variables, the users were grouped with clustering. The best measure of silhouette of cohesion and separation (> 0.3) for the clusters was achieved based on four variables: situation in which the mental health problem was identified, place of first care, origin of referral to the current service, and bond maintenance with primary health care (PHC). The clusters identified in the study demonstrated: (1) low participation of PHC in welcoming new cases, with most of the care taking place in specialized services; (2) high proportion of cases identified in crisis situations; (3) low participation of PHC in the referral of cases, with high access to specialized services by spontaneous demand; (4) lack of continuity in PHC services after entering the specialized service. The study highlighted significant weaknesses in the studied healthcare network, evincing the need to develop strategies that foster the services integration, especially regarding PHC, both to favor access to specialized care in a timely manner and to enable the continuity of care between different healthcare facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.