ArticlePLOS global public health2025
A descriptive study of fatal drownings among children and adolescents in the United States, with a focus on retention pond deaths, 2004-2020.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socio-economic, demographic, and environmental characteristics of child drowning on Sandwip Island, Bangladesh.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Swimming for Children with Disability: Experiences of Rehabilitation and Swimming Professionals in Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize fatal drownings among children and adolescents, with a focus on retention pond drownings, and identify risk factors for these fatalities using child death review data. We acquired 2004-2020 National Fatality Review-Case Reporting System data for drowning deaths among youth 0-19 years. Retention pond drownings were identified through case narratives. We analyzed demographics, primary caregiver, supervisor, death investigation, and drowning-related variables across age groups (<1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15-19 years) using either the Chi-square test or Fisher's Exact test, as appropriate, with a p-value of <0.05 indicating statistical significance. Of 7,539 drowning deaths reported during the study duration, 265 deaths occurred in retention ponds. Children 1-4 years comprised a greater proportion of retention pond drowning deaths (59.3%) compared to overall drowning deaths (50.9%) in this age group. In 51.3% of retention pond drowning deaths among children <5 years, supervision was needed but not provided. Most (80.4%) retention pond-related deaths among children <5 years and 50.7% of deaths among children 5-19 years were attributed to child neglect, poor or absent supervision, or exposure to hazards. Among all decedents who drowned in retention ponds, 19.1% were found to have a disability or chronic illness. Most retention ponds lacked local ordinances regulating water access (83.5%) and did not have barriers or protection (66.1%) or warning signs (82.0%). Younger children with poor or absent supervision who cannot swim are at high risk of drowning. Retention pond drownings are not infrequent, and most locations lack ordinances regulating water access or requiring barriers, such as fences. Greater efforts are needed to address this common hazard and environmental and policy strategies should be implemented to prevent future deaths.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.