ArticlePloS one2025
Design and fabrication of novel microfluidic-based droplets for drug screening on a chronic myeloid leukemia cell line.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rebuilding the MarrowOnco · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe challenges associated with traditional drug screening, such as high costs and long screening times, have led to an increase in the use of single-cell isolation technologies. Small sample volumes are required for high-throughput, cell-based assays to reduce assay costs and enable rapid sample processing. Using microfluidic chips, single-cell analysis can be conducted more effectively, requiring fewer reagents and maintaining biocompatibility. Due to the chip's ability to manipulate small volumes of fluid, high-throughput screening assays can be developed that are both miniaturized and automated. In the present study, we employ microfluidic chips for drug screening in chronic myeloid leukemia. This study aimed to establish a robust methodology integrating diverse assays, providing a holistic understanding of drug response. MATERIAL AND
methodsHerein, we have used a chronic myeloid leukemia derived cell line (K562) for drug screening with an innovative microfluidic-based drug screening approach to investigate the efficacy of imatinib in K562 cells. Cell viability was assessed using MTT assay. Apoptosis was measured using Annexin/PI staining by flow cytometry.
resultsSignificant increased apoptosis was seen in K562 cells treated with imatinib in the microfluidic device compared to cells treated with imatinib in 24- and 96-well plates. Moreover, in the microfluidic chip, drug screening time was reduced from 48 hours to 24 hours.
conclusionCompared to traditional approaches, microfluidic-based drug screening efficiently evaluates the efficacy of imatinib in K562 cells. This approach is promising for drug discovery and treatment optimization, as it increases sensitivity and streamlines the screening process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.