ArticlePloS one2025
Integrating life cycle assessment into supply chain optimization.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating Supply Chain Optimization (SCO) with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is essential for creating supply chains that are both economically efficient and environmentally sustainable. While SCO focuses on optimizing network structures and decisions related to product and service delivery, LCA systematically assesses the environmental impacts across the entire supply chain. The existing literature treats SCO and LCA as separate, sequential steps, often leading to inconsistencies in scope and challenges in data transfer and rescaling. Our research presents a novel Supply Chain Life Cycle Optimization (SCLCO) model that integrates SCO and LCA. Our SCLCO model is based on LCA data structures, incorporates multi-time period, closed-loop SCO decisions (e.g. reverse chain management, inventory control, network design), and is capable of considering the three pillars of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. It includes harmonizing principles, terminology, and notation, thereby bridging the gap between the SCO and LCA communities through a generalized formulation. Computational experiments on a selected SCO model from Operations Research literature validate the SCLCO and demonstrate its effectiveness in providing valuable insights to both SCO and LCA practitioners and researchers. The results emphasize that the simultaneous execution of SCO and LCA in SCLCO minimizes the risk of overlooking decision impacts and facilitates data transfer from existing LCA databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.