ArticleGenetics2025
Guidelines for gene and genome assembly nomenclature.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Taming the reference genome jungle: the refget sequence collection standard.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- A haplotype-resolved, chromosome-scale genome assembly and annotation for Carya glabra (pignut hickory; Juglandaceae).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Genome Database for Vaccinium: a knowledgebase for genetics, genomics, and breeding research.Genetics · 2026Article
- SorghumBase: a knowledgebase for sorghum genomics, phenomics, and stakeholder engagement.Genetics · 2026Article
- The future is FAIR: a community framework for enhanced data management and data sharing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Gramene 2025: expanded comparative genomics and pathway resources, integrated search, and pan-genome portals for crop research.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Towards an official gene nomenclature for Populus trichocarpa.Tree physiology · 2025Review
- Taming the reference genome jungle: the refget sequence collection standard.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- White paper: standards for handling and analyzing plant pan-genomes.F1000Research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid increase in the number of reference-quality genome assemblies presents significant new opportunities for genomic research. However, the absence of standardized naming conventions for genome assemblies and annotations across datasets creates substantial challenges. Inconsistent naming hinders the identification of correct assemblies, complicates the integration of bioinformatics pipelines, and makes it difficult to link assemblies across multiple resources. To address this, we developed a specification for standardizing the naming of reference genome assemblies, to improve consistency across datasets and facilitate interoperability. This specification was created with FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) practices in mind, ensuring that reference assemblies are easier to locate, access, and reuse across research communities. Additionally, it has been designed to comply with primary genomic data repositories, including members of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration consortium, ensuring compatibility with widely used databases. While initially tailored to the agricultural genomics community, the specification is adaptable for use across different taxa. Widespread adoption of this standardized nomenclature would streamline assembly management, better enable cross-species analyses, and improve the reproducibility of research. It would also enhance natural language processing applications that depend on consistent reference assembly names in genomic literature, promoting greater integration and automated analysis of genomic data. This is a good time to consider more consistent genomic data nomenclature as many research communities and data resources are now finding themselves juggling multiple datasets from multiple data providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.