ArticleGM crops & food2025
Public knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions toward genetically modified foods in Lebanon.
Article in GM crops & food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of GMO media strategies on public perceptions of CRISPR crop technologies in Southern Ontario.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Analysis of public perception and socio-demographic drivers of genetically modified organisms in Iran.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Understanding Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: A Theory of Planned Behavior-Brand Equity-Sociodemographic Interactions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetically modified foods (GMFs) have garnered significant attention due to their implications for health, agriculture, and food security. Understanding knowledge and perceptions of GMFs is essential, as these factors influence acceptance and attitudes. This study, the first of its kind in Lebanon, aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding GMFs and to explore their association with socio-demographic characteristics. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,001 participants who completed a 50-item questionnaire, followed by a 15-minute educational session on GMFs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Prior to the educational session, participants had an average knowledge score of 60.3 ± 17.4%, which significantly increased to 83.0 ± 15.8% afterward. Attitude and perception scores improved from an average of 30.3 ± 25.1% pre-intervention to 38.9 ± 12.4% post-intervention. Females demonstrated significantly higher knowledge scores, and educational attainment was positively correlated with knowledge levels both pre- and post-intervention. Younger participants and those in health-related fields scored higher before the intervention, while unemployed individuals scored lower. Additionally, higher educational levels and health-related educational backgrounds were linked to better attitudes and perceptions pre-intervention, while unemployment correlated with lower scores. Interestingly, multivariate regression analysis indicated that being under 35 years of age, having a health-related educational background, and holding a university degree were predictors of higher GMF knowledge. Consequently, individuals with initially lower knowledge level benefited the most from the educational intervention, exhibiting the greatest knowledge increases post-education. Our findings underscore the importance of targeted educational initiatives to bridge knowledge gaps and address misconceptions regarding GMFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.