Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39813064›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2025

Artificial Intelligence-Guided Lung Ultrasound by Nonexperts.

Cristiana Baloescu, John Bailitz, Baljash Cheema, Ravi Agarwala, Madeline Jankowski, Onyinyechi Eke, Rachel Liu, Jason Nomura, Lori Stolz, Luna Gargani and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05992324 (A Validation Study to Evaluate the Performance of Caption Health Lung Guidance and Interpretation), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05992324 narecruitingnot on this map

A Validation Study to Evaluate the Performance of Caption Health Lung Guidance and Interpretation

TypeinterventionalSponsorCaption Health, Inc.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled220ConditionsShortness of BreathArmsCaption LungAI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Airway Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in thoracic ultrasound.The European respiratory journal · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Cristiana BaloescuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
John BailitzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Baljash CheemaDepartment of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Ravi AgarwalaLeBauer Pulmonary and Critical Care, Cone Health, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Madeline JankowskiDepartment of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Onyinyechi EkeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Rachel LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jason NomuraSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lori StolzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Luna GarganiDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Eren AlkanCaption Health/GE HealthCare, Chicago, Illinois.
Tyler WellmanCaption Health/GE HealthCare, Chicago, Illinois.
Nripesh ParajuliCaption Health/GE HealthCare, Chicago, Illinois.
Andrew MarraCaption Health/GE HealthCare, Chicago, Illinois.
Yngvil ThomasCaption Health/GE HealthCare, Chicago, Illinois.
Daven PatelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Evelyn SchraftDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
James O'BrienDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Christopher L MooreDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Michael GottliebDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lung ultrasound (LUS) aids in the diagnosis of patients with dyspnea, including those with cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but requires technical proficiency for image acquisition. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in guiding novice users to acquire high-quality cardiac ultrasound images, suggesting its potential for broader use in LUS. Objective: To evaluate the ability of AI to guide acquisition of diagnostic-quality LUS images by trained health care professionals (THCPs). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter diagnostic validation study conducted between July 2023 and December 2023, participants aged 21 years or older with shortness of breath recruited from 4 clinical sites underwent 2 ultrasound examinations: 1 examination by a THCP operator using Lung Guidance AI and the other by a trained LUS expert without AI. The THCPs (including medical assistants, respiratory therapists, and nurses) underwent standardized AI training for LUS acquisition before participation. Interventions: Lung Guidance AI software uses deep learning algorithms guiding LUS image acquisition and B-line annotation. Using an 8-zone LUS protocol, the AI software automatically captures images of diagnostic quality. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of THCP-acquired examinations of diagnostic quality according to a panel of 5 masked expert LUS readers, who provided remote review and ground truth validation. Results: The intention-to-treat analysis included 176 participants (81 female participants [46.0%]; mean [SD] age, 63 [14] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 31 [8]). Overall, 98.3% (95% CI, 95.1%-99.4%) of THCP-acquired studies were of diagnostic quality, with no statistically significant difference in quality compared to LUS expert-acquired studies (difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, -1.6% to 5.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter validation study, THCPs with AI assistance achieved LUS images meeting diagnostic standards compared with LUS experts without AI. This technology could extend access to LUS to underserved areas lacking expert personnel. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05992324.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDyspneaLungPulmonary EdemaAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39813064
PMCPMC11904735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.