ArticleJAMA cardiology2025
Artificial Intelligence-Guided Lung Ultrasound by Nonexperts.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05992324 (A Validation Study to Evaluate the Performance of Caption Health Lung Guidance and Interpretation), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Validation Study to Evaluate the Performance of Caption Health Lung Guidance and Interpretation
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning for detecting early gastric cancer with white-light endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in assisted localization of fetal ultrasound standard planes: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Multimodal Diagnostic Ultrasound for Congestion, Perfusion, and Ultrafiltration Tolerance in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lung Ultrasound in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Diagnostic Tool, Prognostic Marker or Monitoring Strategy?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in paediatric chest imaging: applications, challenges, and future directions.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Induced Deskilling in Interventional Pulmonology: An International Cross-Sectional Survey on Risk Perception and Mitigation Strategies.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Observational
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Improving structural heart disease screening: AI-ECG and novice AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in fracture detection with ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
- Congestion and renal function in patients with chronic heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Airway Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for pleural effusion and pneumothorax detection on thoracic ultrasound: an educational viewpoint on the promise, pitfalls and path forward.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- The Role of CEUS in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Pleuropulmonary Diseases and Interventional Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Artificial Intelligence as a "Digital Mentor" for POCUS Image Acquisition and Quality Assurance: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Highlights from the Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology 2025: fostering implementation of advanced technologies for precision patient-centered care.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in thoracic ultrasound.The European respiratory journal · 2026Article
- The role of thoracic ultrasound in fluid management in critical care: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Analysis for Pleural Effusion Detection on Thoracic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultrasound medicine in the era of precision theranostics: Mechanisms, molecular strategies, and clinical translation.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence to improve patient care in emergency medicine: a workflow-based analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Lung ultrasound (LUS) aids in the diagnosis of patients with dyspnea, including those with cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but requires technical proficiency for image acquisition. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in guiding novice users to acquire high-quality cardiac ultrasound images, suggesting its potential for broader use in LUS. Objective: To evaluate the ability of AI to guide acquisition of diagnostic-quality LUS images by trained health care professionals (THCPs). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter diagnostic validation study conducted between July 2023 and December 2023, participants aged 21 years or older with shortness of breath recruited from 4 clinical sites underwent 2 ultrasound examinations: 1 examination by a THCP operator using Lung Guidance AI and the other by a trained LUS expert without AI. The THCPs (including medical assistants, respiratory therapists, and nurses) underwent standardized AI training for LUS acquisition before participation. Interventions: Lung Guidance AI software uses deep learning algorithms guiding LUS image acquisition and B-line annotation. Using an 8-zone LUS protocol, the AI software automatically captures images of diagnostic quality. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of THCP-acquired examinations of diagnostic quality according to a panel of 5 masked expert LUS readers, who provided remote review and ground truth validation. Results: The intention-to-treat analysis included 176 participants (81 female participants [46.0%]; mean [SD] age, 63 [14] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 31 [8]). Overall, 98.3% (95% CI, 95.1%-99.4%) of THCP-acquired studies were of diagnostic quality, with no statistically significant difference in quality compared to LUS expert-acquired studies (difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, -1.6% to 5.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter validation study, THCPs with AI assistance achieved LUS images meeting diagnostic standards compared with LUS experts without AI. This technology could extend access to LUS to underserved areas lacking expert personnel. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05992324.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.