Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39813033›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Gender Disparities and Lung Cancer Screening Outcomes Among Individuals Who Have Never Smoked.

Yeon Wook Kim, Dong-Hyun Joo, So Yeon Kim, Young Sik Park, Sowon Jang, Jong Hyuk Lee, Gerard A Silvestri, Marjolein A Heuvelmans, Jihang Kim, Hyeontaek Hwang and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Improving lung cancer screening diagnostic efficiency.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Over- and underscreening for lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Low dose CT for lung cancer screening.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Editorial: Current Approaches to Screening for Lung Cancer in Smokers and Non-Smokers.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yeon Wook KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Hyun JooDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
So Yeon KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Sik ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
Sowon JangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hyuk LeeDepartment of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gerard A SilvestriDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Marjolein A HeuvelmansUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jihang KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Hyeontaek HwangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Choon-Taek LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (INS) is a growing global concern, with a rapidly increasing incidence and proportion among all lung cancer cases. Particularly in East Asia, opportunistic lung cancer screening (LCS) programs targeting INS have gained popularity. However, the sex-specific outcomes and drawbacks of screening INS remain unexplored, with data predominantly focused on women. Objective: To compare LCS outcomes between Asian women and men with no smoking history. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study was conducted at health checkup centers in South Korea from 2009 to 2021. Participants included individuals aged 50 to 80 years with no smoking history who underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. Data were retrospectively analyzed from November 2023 to June 2024. Exposures: Opportunistic LDCT screening for lung cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants were followed up until December 2022 for the outcome of death. Lung cancer diagnosis, diagnostic characteristics, clinical course, and lung cancer-specific deaths (LCSD) were compared between women and men. Results: A total of 21 062 participants (16 133 [76.6%] women and 4929 [23.4%] men) with a mean (SD) age of 59.8 (7.2) years were included. From baseline screening, 176 participants (139 women [0.9%] and 37 men [0.8%]) were diagnosed with lung cancer (screen-detected); 131 of 139 women (94.3%) and 33 of 37 men (89.2%) were diagnosed with stage 0 to I disease, with 133 of 139 women (95.7%) and 36 of 37 men (97.3%) having adenocarcinoma. There were no significant sex-based differences in stage or histologic type distribution. Among the 21 062 screened individuals, LCSD was reported in 8 women and 3 men during a mean (SD) follow-up of 83.8 (41.7) months. Multivariable analyses found no significant association between sex and cumulative hazards of lung cancer diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64-1.26] for men vs women) or LCSD (aHR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.28-4.00] for men vs women). The estimated 5-year lung cancer-specific survival rate was 97.7% for women and 100% for men with screen-detected lung cancer, showing no significant sex differences. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Asian individuals with no smoking history who underwent LDCT screening, no significant sex-based differences were detected in lung cancer diagnosis, stage distribution, or LCSD. These findings suggest that men and women who have never smoked would experience similar risks of overdiagnosis with little to no benefit when exposed to indiscriminate screening.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID39813033
PMCPMC11736501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.