Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812977›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Bio- and Chemoinformatic Approaches for Metabolomics Data Analysis.

Michael Witting, Johannes Rainer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael WittingMetabolomics and Proteomics Core, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany. Michael.witting@helmholtz-munich.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1462-4426
Johannes RainerInstitute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-7147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics data analysis includes, next to the preprocessing, several additional repetitive tasks that can however be heavily dataset dependent or experiment setup specific due to the vast heterogeneity in instrumentation, protocols, or also compounds/samples that are being measured. To address this, various toolboxes and software packages in Python or R have been and are being developed providing researchers and analysts with bioinformatic/chemoinformatic tools to create their own workflows tailored toward their specific needs. This chapter presents tools and example workflows for common tasks focusing on the functionality provided by R packages developed as part of the RforMassSpectrometry initiative. These tasks include, among others, examples to work with chemical formulae, handle and process mass spectrometry data, or calculate similarities between fragment spectra.

Indexed as

CheminformaticsComputational BiologyData AnalysisMetabolomicsHumansMass SpectrometrySoftwareWorkflowFormula handlingMass spectra handlingRRforMassSpectrometrySpectra similarity calculation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.