ArticlePain and therapy2025
Restorative Neurostimulation Therapy Compared to Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation (RESTORE) for the Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain due to Multifidus Dysfunction.
Article in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04803214 (ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation combined with physiotherapy in the management of chronic pain in adults: a systematic review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation on Multifidus Muscle Function in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Trial
- Restorative neuromodulation for chronic lumbar spine pain secondary to a long construct spinal fusion: a case report.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Real-world two-year durability of restorative neurostimulation for treatment of multifidus dysfunction in patients with chronic low back pain: an observational German cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Observational
- Lumbar multifidus muscle morphology on MRI after restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain: a single centre case series using the Goutallier classification.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- A Proposed Diagnostic and Treatment Algorithm for the Management of Lumbar Discogenic Pain [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Myofascial pain in older adults: a geroscience-informed framework integrating precision geriatrics and digital therapeutics.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- The effect of baseline spinal magnetic resonance imaging features on restorative neurostimulation efficacy in patients with chronic low back pain.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
- ISASS Recommendations and Coverage Criteria for Restorative Neurostimulation for Multifidus Dysfunction, Lumbar Region: Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity-An ISASS 2025 Guideline Update.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Multifidus Dysfunction and Chronic Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Supporting Data for Accurate Diagnosis and Successful Treatment Outcomes Associated With Restorative Neurostimulation.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Evidence of Multifidus Changes Post-Lumbar Radiofrequency Ablation: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Comparison Between Physical Methods Based on Mechanical Action and Pharmacotherapy in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Primer on Anatomy, Biophysics, Pathology, Imaging and Treatment of the Intervertebral Disc and the Anterior Spinal Column: The Discogenic, Intervertebral, Spinal Column (DISC) ASPN Workgroup.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Restorative Neurostimulation for Patients with Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain and Impaired Neuromuscular Control of the Lumbar Spine | A New Treatment Paradigm.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMany interventional strategies are commonly used to treat chronic low back pain (CLBP), though few are specifically intended to target the distinct underlying pathomechanisms causing low back pain. Restorative neurostimulation has been suggested as a specific treatment for mechanical CLBP resulting from multifidus dysfunction. In this randomized controlled trial, we report outcomes from a cohort of patients with CLBP associated with multifidus dysfunction treated with restorative neurostimulation compared to those randomized to a control group receiving optimal medical management (OMM) over 1 year.
methodsRESTORE is a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Candidates were assessed for CLBP associated with multifidus dysfunction, with no indication for or history of lumbar spine surgery. Participants were randomized to either restorative neurostimulation with the ReActiv8 system or OMM. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the mean change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between the treatment and control arms at 1 year, and secondary endpoints included pain (numeric rating scale [NRS]) and health-related quality of life (EuroQol Five-Dimension [EQ-5D-5L]).
resultsA total of 203 patients, average age 47 years, and with an average 11-year history of low back pain, were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was a statistically significant demonstration of a clinically relevant mean improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between restorative neurostimulation and OMM arms: ODI (-19.7 ± 1.4 vs. -2.9 ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Additionally, improvements in both the numeric rating scale (NRS) (-3.6 ± 0.2 vs. -0.6 ± 0.2; p < 0.001) and EuroQol Five-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) (0.155 ± 0.012 vs. 0.008 ± 0.012; p < 0.001) were statistically and clinically significant in the restorative neurostimulation arm compared to the OMM arm.
conclusionThe RESTORE trial demonstrates that restorative neurostimulation is a safe, reversible, clinically effective, and highly durable option for patients suffering with nonoperative CLBP associated with multifidus dysfunction. This demonstration of treatment superiority over OMM through 1 year is a significant milestone in addressing a major health burden and unmet clinical need.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04803214.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.