ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
The role of attention in eliciting a musically induced visual motion aftereffect.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have reported visual motion aftereffects (MAEs) following prolonged exposure to auditory stimuli depicting motion, such as ascending or descending musical scales. The role of attention in modulating these cross-modal MAEs, however, remains unclear. The present study manipulated the level of attention directed to musical scales depicting motion and assessed subsequent changes in MAE strength. In Experiment 1, participants either responded to an occasional secondary auditory stimulus presented concurrently with the musical scales (diverted-attention condition) or focused on the scales (control condition). In Experiment 2 we increased the attentional load of the task by having participants perform an auditory 1-back task in one ear, while the musical scales were played in the other. Visual motion perception in both experiments was assessed via random dot kinematograms (RDKs) varying in motion coherence. Results from Experiment 1 replicated prior work, in that extended listening to ascending scales resulted in a greater likelihood of judging RDK motion as descending, in line with the MAE. In contrast, the MAE was eliminated in Experiment 2. These results were internally replicated using an in-lab, within-participant design (Experiment 3). These results suggest that attention is necessary in eliciting an auditory-induced visual MAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39812933What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.