SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Analysis of the incidence of death, hemorrhage, and neurological deficit in the treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs): surgery versus other treatments - a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Spontaneous obliteration of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a meta-analysis of incidence and angioarchitectural correlates.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of embolization for basal ganglia or thalamic arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuroradiology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the incidence of mortality, hemorrhage, and neurological deficits in treating intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in patients over 18 through a comparative analysis of surgical approaches and other therapeutic modalities. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and LILACS databases in November 2023. Inclusion criteria included clinical trials, cohorts studies, case-controls studies, and case series comparing patients over 18 undergoing surgery or microsurgery versus other treatments (radiosurgery, isolated embolization, and conservative treatment). Exclusions criteria included studies on non-AVM diseases, non-intracranial AVMs, cavernous malformations, pregnant patients, and those treated with both radiosurgery and microsurgery. Twelve studies included 1,555 patients, with an average age of 42.65 years. Of these, 711 underwent surgery (with or without prior embolization), and 844 underwent other procedures. In the surgery group, the incidence of death was 1.69%, while in the other procedures group, it was 2.96%. The incidence of neurological deficits and hemorrhage in the surgery group was 11.67% and 4.22%, respectively. In other procedures, these incidences were both 9.12%. The average obliteration rate in the surgery group was 97.45%, compared to 49.77% for radiosurgery, 38.46% for isolated embolization, and 0.6% for conservative treatment. This systematic review highlighs that surgery achieves the highest AVM obliteration rates but carries a higher risk neurological déficits. Radiosurgery minimizes these risks, while conservative treatment offers advantages in mortality and hemorrhage reduction. No single modality proves to be universally superior, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches and further randomized trials to clarify comparative safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39812905What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.