ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Diagnosis of hereditary ataxias: a real-world single center experience.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-scale genetic profiling of hereditary ataxias in China: implications for a stepwise molecular diagnostic strategy.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026Article
- A case report of spinocerebellar ataxia with TRPC3 gene mutation and review of literature.Journal of human genetics · 2026Review
- Digenic inheritance of mutations in SPG7 and AFG3L2 causes motor neuron and cerebellar disorders.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Palindrome-mediated 16p13.3 triplications cause a recognizable neurodegenerative disorder with ataxia.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Diagnostic yield and limitations of whole-genome sequencing for hereditary cerebellar ataxia.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Comprehensive, multidisciplinary care for fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate our experience in the diagnosis of hereditary ataxias (HAs), to analyze data from a real-world scenario. STUDY
designThis is a retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted at a single Italian adult neurogenetic outpatient clinic, in 147 patients affected by ataxia with a suspicion of hereditary forms, recruited from November 1999 to February 2024. A stepwise approach for molecular diagnostics was applied: targeted gene panel (TP) next-generation sequencing (NGS) and/or clinical exome sequencing (CES) were performed in the case of inconclusive first-line genetic testing, such as short tandem repeat expansions (TREs) testing for most common spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA1-3, 6-8,12,17, DRPLA), other forms [Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) and mitochondrial DNA-related ataxia, RFC1-related ataxia/CANVAS] or inconclusive phenotype-guided specific single gene sequencing.
resultA definitive diagnosis was reached in 36.7% of the cases. TREs testing was diagnostic in 30.4% of patients. The three most common TREs ataxias were FRDA (36.1%), SCA2 (27.8%), and RFC1-related ataxia/CANVAS (11.1%). In five patients, the molecular diagnosis was achieved by single gene sequencing and causative mutations were identified in POLG (2), SACS (1), DARS2 (1), MT-ATP6 (1). Of 94 patients with a suspicion of HAs of indeterminate genetic origin, 68 underwent new molecular evaluation using the NGS approach. In 28 of these cases, CES was performed after the TP sequencing resulted negative. In 13 patients, the diagnosis was achieved by NGS approach. In 7 of these 13 patients, the diagnosis was made by CES. Genes mutations identified as causative of HAs were found in SPG7 (4), SACS (1), CACNA1A (1), CACNA1G (1), EEF2 (1), PRKCG (1), KCNC3 (1), ADCK3 (1), SYNE1 (1), ITPR1 (1). A positive family history of ataxia and early onset of symptoms were associated with a higher likelihood of obtaining a definite diagnosis.
conclusionThe molecular diagnosis of HAs remains a significant challenge for neurologists. Our data indicate that, in most cases, a diagnosis of HA can be established through first line genetic testing, particularly TREs testing. However, for patients with a clinical diagnosis of HA who do not achieve a molecular diagnosis through initial genetic tests, the use of NGS proves to be a valuable tool, providing a definitive diagnosis in approximately 20% of cases. Therefore, when feasible in clinical practice, integrating NGS testing, especially exome sequencing, into the diagnostic decision-making process for unsolved cases is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39812846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.