Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812830›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Toxicological problems of tattoo removal: characterization of femtosecond laser-induced fragments of Pigment Green 7 and Green Concentrate tattoo ink.

Elvira Maria Bauer, Cosimo Ricci, Daniele Cecchetti, Giorgia Ciufolini, Daniel Oscar Cicero, Marco Rossi, Ettore Guerriero, Stefano Orlando, Marilena Carbone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elvira Maria Bauer *Institute of Structure of Matter, Italian National Research Council (ISM-CNR), c/o Area della Ricerca di Roma1, Strada Provinciale 35d n. 9, Montelibretti, 00010, Rome, Italy.
Cosimo Ricci *STARTNETICS - Department of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Daniele Cecchetti *STARTNETICS - Department of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Giorgia CiufoliniSTARTNETICS - Department of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Daniel Oscar CiceroSTARTNETICS - Department of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Marco RossiDepartment of Basic and Applied Sciences for Engineering (SBAI), Sapienza University of Rome, Via Antonio Scarpa 16, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Ettore GuerrieroInstitute for Atmospheric Pollution Research, Italian National Research Council (CNR-IIA), c/o Area della Ricerca di Roma1, Strada Provinciale 35d n. 9, Montelibretti, 00010, Rome, Italy.
Stefano OrlandoInstitute of Structure of Matter, Italian National Research Council (ISM-CNR), FemtoLAB, C.da S. Loja, 85050, Tito Scalo, Italy.
Marilena CarboneSTARTNETICS - Department of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. carbone@uniroma2.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4224-1393

Funding

MUR 2022F4YZP9MUR E83C23000340006PNRR IR0000027Regione Lazio 04.09.2017Regione Lazio G11949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Femtosecond lasers represent a novel tool for tattoo removal as sources that can be operated at high power, potentially leading to different removal pathways and products. Consequently, the potential toxicity of its application also needs to be evaluated. In this framework, we present a comparative study of Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser irradiation, as a function of laser power and exposure time, on water dispersions of Pigment Green 7 (PG7) and the green tattoo ink Green Concentrate (GC), which contains PG7 as its coloring agent. The treated samples were subsequently analyzed via UV‒Vis spectroscopy, gas chromatography‒mass spectrometry (GC‒MS), SEM imaging and associated statistical analysis. We found that, on average, the discoloration efficacy of femtosecond laser treatment was comparable to that of nanosecond lasers as were the decomposition products. In fact, two primary types of fragments are produced, both of which are potentially harmful, resulting either from the decomposition of chlorinated phthalocyanine (i.e., PG7) or from the active chlorination of naphthalene impurities. However, the outcomes for the PG7 and GC treatments differed significantly from each other from several points of view. The spectral intensity patterns of GC and PG7 were distinct, depending on the treatment conditions, and showed linearity with power only in the case of GC. Additionally, the relative ratios of the fragment products differed significantly, with the production rate showing a linear dependence on power only in the case of GC and no discernible trend for PG7. Shape and size distribution of the generated particles were highly dependent on the type of sample. Femtosecond laser irradiation of GCs primarily produces nanoparticles with a homogeneous size distribution, which are typically considered nontoxic. Large aggregates also formed, exhibiting a regular shape. In contrast, PG7 yielded rods and needles with aspect ratios similar to those of toxic fibers.

Indexed as

Coloring AgentsIndolesInkLasersTattooingGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryIsoindolesTattoo RemovalTitaniumColoring AgentsIndolesIsoindolesTitaniumFemtosecond laser treatmentFibers generationFragmented moieties hazardGreen tattoo inkNLO mechanismsPigment PG7

Identifiers

PMID39812830
PMCPMC11968555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.