Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812721›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2025

Not All Antiseptic Solutions Are Equivalent in Removing Biofilm: A Comparison Across Different Orthopaedic Surfaces.

Christina A Chao, Tyler K Khilnani, Suenghwan Jo, Aarti Shenoy, Mathias P G Bostrom, Alberto V Carli

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In vitro analysis of antiseptic solution effects onJournal of bone and joint infection · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina A ChaoAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-2060-5368
Tyler K KhilnaniAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3378-6770
Suenghwan JoAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3378-5954
Aarti ShenoyDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-1904-9253
Mathias P G BostromAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-0906-7554
Alberto V CarliAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3129-705

Funding

Field Emission Scanning Electron MicroscopeS10OD026989 · OD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BROMAGE, TIMOTHY G. · 2019 to 2019
$581k
NIH HHS S10 OD026989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiseptic solutions are commonly utilized during total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to prevent and treat periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to investigate which antiseptic solution is most effective against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Escherichia coli biofilms established in vitro on orthopaedic surfaces commonly utilized in total knee arthroplasty: cobalt-chromium (CC), oxidized zirconium (OxZr), and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).

methodsMSSA and E. coli biofilms were grown on CC, OxZr, and PMMA discs for 24 and 72 hours. Biofilm-coated discs were treated with control or various antiseptic solutions for 3 minutes. Solutions included 10% povidone-iodine, a 1:1 mixture of 10% povidone-iodine plus 3% hydrogen peroxide, diluted povidone-iodine, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, and a surfactant-based formulation of ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, and water. Following treatment, discs were sonicated to quantify adherent bacteria or underwent imaging with scanning electron microscopy to identify biofilm. Antiseptic solutions were considered efficacious if they produced a 3-log (1,000-fold) reduction in colony-forming units compared with controls.

resultsOn both OxZr and CC, 10% povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide eradicated all MSSA, and it achieved clinical efficacy on PMMA at both 24-hour MSSA biofilm (p < 0.0002) and 72-hour MSSA biofilm (p = 0.002). On 72-hour MSSA biofilm, 10% povidone-iodine eradicated all bacteria on OxZr and CC, and it achieved clinical efficacy on PMMA (p = 0.04). On 24-hour MSSA biofilm, 10% povidone-iodine achieved efficacy on all surfaces (all p < 0.01). The surfactant-based formulation only achieved clinical efficacy on 72-hour MSSA biofilms on CC (p = 0.04) and OxZr (p = 0.07). On 72-hour E. coli biofilm, 10% povidone-iodine with or without hydrogen peroxide achieved clinical efficacy on all surfaces. No other solution achieved clinical efficacy on either MSSA or E. coli.

conclusionsAntiseptic solutions vary considerably in efficacy against bacterial biofilm. The 10% povidone-iodine solution with or without hydrogen peroxide consistently removed MSSA and E. coli biofilms on multiple orthopaedic surfaces and should be considered for clinical use. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should be aware of the differences in the efficacy of antiseptic solutions on different orthopaedic surfaces when treating MSSA or E. coli biofilms.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalBiofilmsEscherichia coliProsthesis-Related InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChlorhexidineHumansHydrogen PeroxidePolymethyl MethacrylatePovidone-IodineZirconiumAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateHydrogen PeroxidePolymethyl MethacrylatePovidone-IodineZirconium

Identifiers

PMID39812721
PMCPMC12344788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.