Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812687›Full record

ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Atypical mediastinal mass in the fetus: a review of the literature.

Vlasta M E Fesslova, Caterina Poziello, Martina Evangelista, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, Renata Mellone, Antonella Poloniato, Massimo Candiani, Alessandro Frigiola

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vlasta M E FesslovaCenter of Fetal Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097, San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Caterina PozielloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Martina EvangelistaDepartment of Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097, San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Ivo CavorettoDepartment of Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097, San Donato, Milan, Italy. cavoretto.paolo@hsr.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8097-366X
Renata MelloneRadiology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita-Salute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Antonella PoloniatoNeonatology and Pediatrics Departments, RCCS San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita-Salute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Massimo CandianiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro FrigiolaDepartment of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097, San Donato, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCongenital thoracic masses (CTMs) are suspected in presence of solid or cystic thoracic lesions at ultrasound. The common typical fetal CTMs encompass: hyperechogenic lung lesions such as congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM), broncopulmonary sequestration (PS) and congenital high airway obstruction syndrome (CHAOS); less common solid thoracic masses are mediastinal/pericardial tumors as rhabdomyoma and teratoma. The aim of our study is to gather the available evidence on cases of atypical CTMs of difficult classification, for which the diagnosis remains often uncertain.

methodsA review of the literature on the prenatal diagnosis of CTMs was performed, focusing on ultrasound features, postnatal manifestation, treatment and neonatal outcome. Inclusion criterion was prenatal diagnosis of CTM cases with difficult classification in six typical categories. A summary of results was carried out.

resultsThe literature review included six studies in the analysis. Two cases experienced intrauterine fetal death, one with hydrops in rhabdomyoma and another one for a rapid growth of the mass, with autopsies precising the diagnoses. In two other instances, surgery after birth provided also different histologic diagnoses. All surviving children were asymptomatic at follow-up. One case with rhabdomyoma and another one with atypical pericardial teratoma showed spontaneous regression. Moreover we are presenting our unpublished case of an atypical mass diagnosed as rhabdomyoma or broncopulmonary sequestration.

conclusionsSome masses may present atypical presentation of a known disease or we may face rare diagnosis for which there is lack of information in the literature. The definitive diagnosis still relies on histologic analysis.

Indexed as

Fetal DiseasesMediastinal NeoplasmsRhabdomyomaTeratomaBronchopulmonary SequestrationFemaleHumansPregnancyUltrasonography, PrenatalAtypical cardiac massFetal echocardiographyFetal echographyTumorsUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39812687
PMCPMC11890237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.