Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812681›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Thrombectomy : Stent retriever vs aspiration].

Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus

Abstract readReviewComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Research Trends and Hotspots of Collateral Circulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Bibliometric Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ruben Mühl-BenninghausKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Bögelstraße 1, 21339, Lüneburg, Deutschland. Ruben.mbe@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Besides intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular therapy (EVT) is also a standard treatment option for acute ischemic stroke. The clinical efficacy and safety of this procedure was proven in 2015 by several randomized controlled trials. The aim of EVT is to achieve the fastest possible recanalization of an occluded artery supplying the brain and, thus, reperfusion of the brain tissue. In EVT, the thrombus is thrombectomized mechanically using wire-mounted self-expanding stents (so-called stent retrievers) and/or aspirated through aspiration catheters. The extent of brain tissue reperfusion influences the clinical outcome of the affected patients. High reperfusion scores (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [TICI]) correlate positively with more favorable clinical outcomes. However, even after achieving high TICI scores, the clinical outcome of stroke patients with large vessel occlusions varies considerably. There are many reasons for this. In addition to the collateral supply and the perfusion pressure of the affected brain area, the period of tissue ischemia plays a particularly important role in preservation of brain function. In addition to the TICI score, the number of thrombectomy maneuvers performed and consequently the duration of the intervention has an influence on the clinical outcome of the treated patients.

Indexed as

Device RemovalEndovascular ProceduresStentsThrombectomyHumansSuctionEndovascular therapyIntra-arterial lysis therapyIschaemic strokeRecanalisationReperfusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.