ReviewAging and disease2024
Pros and Cons of Human Brain Organoids to Study Alzheimer's Disease.
Review in Aging and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human iPSC-Derived Brain Organoids: A Disease-Oriented Evaluation of Modeling Fidelity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Neuromechanobiology: Bridging Mechanobiology and Neuroscience Through Evidence and Open Questions.Cells · 2026Review
- Experimental Models and Translational Strategies in Neuroprotective Drug Development with Emphasis on Alzheimer's Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Choroid plexus organoids mimic amyloid uptake at the blood-cerebrospinal fluid-barrier.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- The translational power of Alzheimer's-based organoid models in personalized medicine: an integrated biological and digital approach embodying patient clinical history.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing pressure for researchers to reduce their reliance on animals, particularly in early-stage research. The main reason for that change arises from the different biological behavior of humans that leads to frequent failure of translating data from bench to bed. The advent of organoid technology ten years ago, along with the feasibility of obtaining brain organoids in most laboratories, has created considerable expectations not exempting frustration. In this review, we make a critical appraisal of the advantages and limitations of studying Alzheimer´s disease in brain cortical organoids derived from inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). While dealing with human neurons and glia in 3D poses a tremendous advantage versus murine brain cells, organoids typically lack microglia, blood vessels, immune interactions as well as proper CNS neuropil. In turn, they have relatively few oligodendrocytes and low myelination. In addition, lengthy procedures to get proper mature organoids constitute an additional limitation that may also affect the native biological properties of neurons and glia. We conclude that human brain organoids, while popular and useful, remain a model that needs further refinement before bringing substantial value to study Alzheimer´s disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.