Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812545›Full record

SynthesisAging and disease2024

Physical Prehabilitation for Older Patients with Cancer before Complex Medical-Surgical Interventions: An Umbrella Review.

Dana Loudovici-Krug, Louise André, Heiner Paul Blumensaat, Marion Granger, Laetitia Stefani, Josephine Kühnemund, Christina Lemhöfer, Claire Falandry

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aging and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Surgery in Older Cancer Patients.Current oncology reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dana Loudovici-KrugInstitute for Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Louise AndréService de Gériatrie, Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Heiner Paul BlumensaatInstitute for Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Marion GrangerService de Gériatrie, Centre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie, Chambéry, France.
Laetitia StefaniCentre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, BP 90074, 74374 Pringy, France.
Josephine KühnemundInstitute for Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Christina LemhöferInstitute for Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Claire FalandryService de Gériatrie, Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prehabilitation has become a field of increasing interest over recent decades. However, few studies specifically investigated prehabilitation for older patients with cancer. The objective of this umbrella review was to summarize evidence on prehabilitation programs to identify the physical interventions that may be applied with benefit to older cancer patients who will undergo complex medical-surgical procedures. The protocol was registered in Prospero. Major databases, namely PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and Prospero, were searched until summer 2020 and a second search was performed until November 2023. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, dealing with the major topic of prehabilitation for older patients with cancer diagnosis. Among 1425 records (633 until 2020, 792 until November 2023), 14 reviews were selected for inclusion. According to the AMSTAR-2 checklist, the median quality score was 11 (range: 5-12). Total duration of prehabilitation ranged from 1 to 5 weeks, session duration from 20 to 50 minutes, session frequency from 3 to 6 per week. Reported program modes were aerobic and resistance exercises. Concerning the outcome measures, the functional as well as the respiratory status was significantly affected. Quality of life did not benefit significantly, but showed a positive trend. The length of hospital stay was not significantly improved in the majority of the studies. In contrast, most systematic reviews reported significantly lower numbers of total postoperative complications. Functional recovery was enhanced in half of the found reviews. Prehabilitation is a growing field, notably also in reviews focussing on oncological care for elderly patients included in this umbrella review. Aerobic and resistance exercises are the core of the majority of the programs evaluated but their characteristics (total duration, frequency) are partly heterogeneous. Prehabilitation for older patients may also include other modalities of geriatric interventions like nutritional or psychological optimization.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPreoperative ExerciseAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicQuality of LifeSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39812545
PMCPMC12339116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.