ArticleGenetic epidemiology2025
Multivariable MR Can Mitigate Bias in Two-Sample MR Using Covariable-Adjusted Summary Associations.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing the causal effects of environmental tobacco smoke exposure: a meta-analytic Mendelian randomization study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026Pooled it
- Using Negative Control Outcomes to Detect Selection Bias in Mendelian Randomization Studies.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing the impact of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy on perinatal health: a wide-angled Mendelian randomization study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Adiposity distribution and risks of 12 obesity-related cancers: a Mendelian randomization analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Assessing the causal and independent impact of parity-related reproductive factors on risk of breast cancer subtypes.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Obstructive sleep apnea mediates genetic risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Hispanic and Latino communities.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- A semi-empirical Bayes approach for calibrating weak instrumental bias in sex-specific Mendelian randomization studies.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Associations of Genetically Predicted CKD With Urinary Tract Cancer and Lung Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- Investigating whether smoking and alcohol behaviours influence risk of type 2 diabetes using a Mendelian randomisation study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Estimating Causal Effects on a Disease Progression Trait Using Bivariate Mendelian Randomisation.Genetic epidemiology · 2025Article
- Identification of Key Periodontitis Genes and Their Mechanisms of Action Using Comprehensive Multiple Microarray Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Methods.International journal of genomics · 2025Article
- The role of accelerometer-derived sleep traits on glycated haemoglobin and glucose levels: a Mendelian randomization study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mammographic density mediates the protective effect of early-life body size on breast cancer risk.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Collider bias correction for multiple covariates in GWAS using robust multivariable Mendelian randomization.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Effects of Platelet Count on Blood Pressure: Evidence from Observational and Genetic Investigations.Genes · 2023Article
- Observational and Genetic Evidence for Bidirectional Effects Between Red Blood Cell Traits and Diastolic Blood Pressure.American journal of hypertension · 2023Article
- The mediating role of mammographic density in the protective effect of early-life adiposity on breast cancer risk: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- The UK BiLEVE and Mendelian randomisation: using multivariable instrumental variables to address "damned if you, damned if you don't" adjustment problems.BMC research notes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are hypothesis-free studies that estimate the association between polymorphisms across the genome with a trait of interest. To increase power and to estimate the direct effects of these single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on a trait GWAS are often conditioned on a covariate (such as body mass index or smoking status). This adjustment can introduce bias in the estimated effect of the SNP on the trait. Two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies use summary statistics from GWAS estimate the causal effect of a risk factor (or exposure) on an outcome. Covariate adjustment in GWAS can bias the effect estimates obtained from MR studies conducted using covariate adjusted GWAS data. Multivariable MR (MVMR) is an extension of MR that includes multiple traits as exposures. Here we propose the use of MVMR to correct the bias in MR studies from covariate adjustment. We show how MVMR can recover unbiased estimates of the direct effect of the exposure of interest by including the covariate used to adjust the GWAS within the analysis. We apply this method to estimate the effect of systolic blood pressure on type-2 diabetes and the effect of waist circumference on systolic blood pressure. Our analytical and simulation results show that MVMR provides unbiased effect estimates for the exposure when either the exposure or outcome of interest has been adjusted for a covariate. Our results also highlight the parameters that determine when MR will be biased by GWAS covariate adjustment. The results from the applied analysis mirror these results, with equivalent results seen in the MVMR with and without adjusted GWAS. When GWAS results have been adjusted for a covariate, biasing MR effect estimates, direct effect estimates of an exposure on an outcome can be obtained by including that covariate as an additional exposure in an MVMR estimation. However, the estimated effect of the covariate obtained from the MVMR estimation is biased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.