Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812300›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2025

Optimization of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin therapy for Japanese patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Taketo Kawai, Yoshiaki Kurokawa, Satoru Taguchi, Kazuki Honda, Kazuki Maki, Yoshiki Ambe, Naoki Saegusa, Masahiro Yamamoto, Jimpei Miyakawa, Yuumi Tokura and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Taketo KawaiDepartment of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, 6-1-14 Konodai, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-0827, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-2874
Yoshiaki KurokawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Satoru TaguchiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1291-4294
Kazuki HondaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Kazuki MakiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Yoshiki AmbeDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Naoki SaegusaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Masahiro YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Jimpei MiyakawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Yuumi TokuraDepartment of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Hazuki InoueDepartment of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Takehiro TanakaDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Katsuhiko NaraDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Tomoyuki KanekoDepartment of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Yoichi FujiiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Jun KameiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Shigenori KakutaniDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Yuta YamadaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Aya NiimiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Daisuke YamadaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Tappei TakadaDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Tohru NakagawaDepartment of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Haruki KumeDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) regimen has been established as a systemic chemotherapy for patients with urothelial carcinoma. However, it is rarely used in Japan owing to the challenges associated with managing the related adverse events. This study aimed to optimize the dd-MVAC protocol for Japanese patients.

methodsCriteria were developed to adjust the doses of anticancer drugs used in dd-MVAC. In this regimen, the initial cycle of methotrexate and cisplatin was administered at 75% of the full dose. Patients who did not experience significant toxicities during the first cycle subsequently received the full dose starting from the second cycle. Additionally, the doses of methotrexate and cisplatin were adjusted according to the Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance. Based on these criteria, patients with urothelial carcinoma underwent dd-MVAC between August 2018 and May 2023, and all patients were scheduled to undergo six cycles.

resultsA total of 86 patients received dd-MVAC, with 36, 15, and 35 patients receiving it as neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and salvage chemotherapy, respectively. Fifty-nine patients (68.6%) completed the six scheduled cycles. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were observed in 76 (88.4%) patients; however, most were manageable. In the neoadjuvant cohort, the pathological complete response rate was 52.2% among patients with clinical N0 lower tract urothelial carcinoma. High levels of alkaline phosphatase at the initiation of treatment were correlated with failure to complete six cycles of dd-MVAC.

conclusionAdjusting the dd-MVAC regimen based on renal function and significant adverse events may result in a high completion rate of scheduled treatments in Japanese patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrologic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCisplatinDoxorubicinEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedVinblastineCisplatinDoxorubicinMethotrexateVinblastinedose-dense MVACJapanese patientstreatment completion rateurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39812300
PMCPMC11973633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.