ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2025
Varicocele management in Tunisia: Overview of practices and comparison with latest international guidelines.
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVaricocele has a detrimental effect on testicular growth and spermatogenesis, hence the importance of its management. This management remains controversial among Tunisian urologists; diagnostic and therapeutic choices tend to vary from one urologist to another.
aimThe aim of this survey is to evaluate the practices of Tunisian urologists regarding varicocele management compared to the latest international guidelines.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among Tunisian urologists, members of the Tunisian Association of Urology, using a computerized questionnaire available online.
resultsThe response rate was 51.6%. Approximately 80% of Tunisian urologists reported that they diagnose and manage patients with varicocele at least once a week. Half of the Tunisian urologists use a grading system for classification. Over 75% of Tunisian urologists believe that scrotal ultrasound and semen analysis should be systematically requested. Half of them consider treatment starting from Dubin and Amelar grade 2, while the other half treat from Dubin and Amelar grade 3. The majority agreed that the results of varicocele repair are controversial, with 10% never performing bilateral varicocele repair. The vast majority planned surgical treatment (95%), with sub-inguinal approach and magnification used in only 16% of cases; 25% never froze sperm before varicocele repair.
conclusionRecent recommendations had clear messages to promote in terms of diagnosis, therapeutic indications, and modalities. This work highlights the existence of gaps between recommendations on certain aspects of varicocele management, suggesting a review of continuous medical education modalities regarding this pathology in particular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.