Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812206›Full record

ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2025

Kaoutar Ghomari, Abderrazak Saddari, Oumayma Abdessalami, Chaymae Benmoussa, Sabrina Belmahi, Hajar Zrouri, Said Ezrari, Elmostapha Benaissa, Yassine Ben Lahlou, Mostafa Elouennass and 1 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kaoutar GhomariLaboratory of microbiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (Mohammed Premier University), Oujda.
Abderrazak SaddariLaboratory of microbiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (Mohammed Premier University), Oujda.
Oumayma AbdessalamiLaboratory of microbiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (Mohammed Premier University), Oujda.
Chaymae BenmoussaLaboratory of microbiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (Mohammed Premier University), Oujda.
Sabrina BelmahiLaboratory of microbiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (Mohammed Premier University), Oujda.
Hajar ZrouriLaboratory of microbiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (Mohammed Premier University), Oujda.
Said EzrariLaboratory of microbiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (Mohammed Premier University), Oujda.
Elmostapha BenaissaDepartment of Bacteriology, Mohammed V Military University Hospital, Rabat.
Yassine Ben LahlouDepartment of Bacteriology, Mohammed V Military University Hospital, Rabat.
Mostafa ElouennassDepartment of Bacteriology, Mohammed V Military University Hospital, Rabat.
Adil MalebLaboratory of microbiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (Mohammed Premier University), Oujda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction-Aim: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common complication in cirrhotic patients and is associated with a high mortality rate. The aim of this study is to determine the epidemiological and bacteriological profile of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, as well as antibiotic resistance among hospitalized patients at CHU Mohammed VI, in order to guide empirical antibiotic choices for better management. Methods: This is a prospective study conducted over a period of 12 months, from January to December 2023, focusing on all requests for bacteriological examination of ascitic fluid samples. All samples received at the microbiology laboratory were processed according to the Medical Microbiology Reference Standard (Remic) Results: A total of 137 ascitic fluid samples were included. The main etiologies implicated in ascites were cirrhosis (50.36% of cases), followed by neoplastic pathology (24.1% of cases). The prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was 13.87%, of which 63.16% corresponded to neutrocytic ascites with negative culture. The rate of bacterascite was 74.07%. Gram-positive cocci constituted the majority of pathogens (56.67%), with 43.33% corresponding to Gram-negative bacilli. 28.57% of coagulase-negative Staphylococci were methicillin-resistant. Quinolone resistance was observed in 23.53% of Gram-positive cocci, and 69.23% of isolated Enterobacteriaceae were multidrug-resistant. Conclusion: The prevalence of SBP due to Gram-positive and multidrug-resistant bacteria has increased in recent years. The currently recommended empirical antibiotic therapy, based on third-generation cephalosporins, carries a high risk of failure and may need to be reassessed.

Indexed as

Ascitic FluidBacterial InfectionsPeritonitisAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAscitesDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistanceinfectionpathogenperitonitis

Identifiers

PMID39812206
PMCPMC11906237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.