Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39812205›Full record

ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2025

Risk factors of the appearance of anencephaly in Tunisia.

Kaouther Nasri, Nadia Ben Jemaa, Soumeya Siala Gaigi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaouther NasriFaculty of Sciences of Bizerte, University of Carthage, 7021 Zarzouna, Bizerte Tunisia.
Nadia Ben JemaaDepartment of histology-embryology, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunisia.
Soumeya Siala GaigiDepartment of embryo-fetopathology, La Rabta Maternity and Neonatology Center, El Manar II University, 1007 Tunis, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnencephaly is a serious developmental defect of the central nervous system in which the brain and cranial vault are grossly malformed. The cerebrum and cerebellum are reduced or absent, but the hindbrain is present. Anencephaly is a part of the neural tube defect spectrum. This defect results when the neural tube fails to close during the third to fourth weeks of development, leading to fetal loss, stillbirth, or neonatal death.

aimTo find out probable principal risk factors for the appearance of anencephaly.

methodsThis study was conducted to compare between pregnancies affected by anencephaly in 2002-2011 with those notified in the period 1991-2001. Statistical analysis was undertaken using chi-squared tests.

resultsResults had shown that anencephaly fetuses with a weight less than 1500 g were significantly higher in the period 2002-2011 than in 1991-2001 (P=0.003; OR= 4.32; CI= 1.62-11.53). Anencephaly cases aged more than 20 weeks of gestation (WG) were statistically elevated than cases aged less than 20 WG (P= 0.003). Maternal parity was associated with the appearance of anencephaly, where uni- or multiparous cases mothers were more likely to have an offspring with anencephaly than nulliparous mothers. Consanguinity presented a significant risk factor for the occurrence of anencephaly (P= 0.003). A logistic regression was run to examine the impact of several variables, only the maternal age was statistically significant.

conclusionThis study clarified fields where efforts should be intensified, and surveillance data developed to prevent this malformation.

Indexed as

AnencephalyAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornParityPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTunisiaAnencephalyEpidemiologyFeto-maternal characteristicsRisk factorsTunisia

Identifiers

PMID39812205
PMCPMC11906246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.