ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Machine-Learning Based Computed Tomography Radiomics Nomgram For Predicting Perineural Invasion In Gastric Cancer.
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics based on Contrast-enhanced CT Images: Biomarkers to Predict the Risk-Grade of Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Translational artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders: Advancing intelligent clinical decision-making for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop and validate predictive models for perineural invasion (PNI) in gastric cancer (GC) using clinical factors and radiomics features derived from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans and to compare the performance of these models.
methodsThis study included 205 GC patients, who were randomly divided into a training set (n=143) and a validation set (n=62) in a 7:3 ratio. Optimal radiomics features were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. A radiomics model was constructed utilizing the optimal among five machine learning filters, and a radiomics score (rad-score) was computed for each participant. A clinical model was built based on clinical factors identified through multivariate logistic regression. Independent clinical factors were combined with the radscore to create a combined radiomics nomogram. The discrimination ability of the models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the DeLong test.
resultsIndependent predictive factors of the clinical model included tumor T stage, N stage, and tumor differentiation, with AUC values of 0.777 and 0.809 in the training and validation sets. The radiomics model was constructed using the support vector machine (SVM) classifier with the best AUC (0.875 in the training set and 0.826 in the validation set). The combined radiomics nomogram, which combines independent clinical predictors and the rad-score, demonstrated better predictive performance (AUC=0.889 in the training set; AUC=0.885 in the validation set).
conclusionThe nomogram integrating independent clinical predictors and CE-CT radiomics was constructed to predict PNI in GC. This model demonstrated favorable performance and could potentially assist in prognosis evaluation and clinical decision-making for GC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.