ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024
Identifying the factors influencing the quality of education from the perspective of nursing students: A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences of pregnant women, midwifery students, and their instructors from implementing a clinical leadership and mentorship program in labor and delivery wards.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing education in Iran suffers from challenges such as inadequate training time, non-scientific methods, lack of facilities, and so on. Nursing students can better discuss these issues and identify variables affecting their education. Thus, this study sought to uncover factors affecting education quality from nursing students' perspectives. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a qualitative study that was conducted on nursing students in 2022. Purposive sampling chose 20 undergraduate nursing students from Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran. The data was acquired using a semi-structured interview. Content analysis was performed using MAXQDA-10 software to extract relevant themes.
resultsThe factors derived from content analysis were classified into two internal and external main themes and six sub-themes, including professors, students, the university/education department, hospitals, and the educational system.
conclusionsAnalyzing the strengths and weaknesses of trainers and professors in practical programs and teaching new practical teaching methods can effectively enhance the quality of nursing education. Also, giving training and welfare equipment and necessities in educational hospitals and changing the headlines and contents of some nursing courses will improve education quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.