ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024
Opinion on agile methodology in education among the nursing students.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAgile methodology (AM) is an innovative, active, project-based learning method. The scrum is a popular agile framework widely used in project management and education. This study evaluates the opinions on agile adaptation in nursing curricula among nursing students to identify how AM can be applied in higher education to facilitate learning. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study employed a cross-sectional design and was conducted at two colleges affiliated with health science university, Bengaluru, India in 2021-22. A 23-item agile scrum perception tool (ASPT) was used to evaluate the opinions on AM among the nursing students after the agile training. The data were analyzed by using IBM SPSS version 28. Descriptive statistics was used to evaluate the opinion.
resultsA total of 133 students responded to the questionnaire. Nearly, 99 (74%) of the students strongly agreed the team leader's (TL) responsibility for managing the time was good. Around 109 (82%) of the students felt that the product owner (PO)/outcome evaluator (OE) explained the course objectives well. About 107 (76%) of students strongly agreed that the learning was facilitated by AM.
conclusionThe agile scrum framework (SF) can be taught and fostered to improve collaborative learning, teamwork, leadership abilities, and educational outcomes. The policymakers should set the criteria for implementing agile in the curriculum, and nurse managers should allocate the budget for organizing the training program in the form of workshops and conferences for the nursing educators and nurses which could help to improve the self-directed learning and safe collaborative quality of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.