ArticlePlant diversity2024
Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus are more sensitive to environmental factors in dicots than in monocots, globally.
Article in Plant diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leaf nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) levels provide critical strategies for plant adaptions to changing environments. However, it is unclear whether leaf N and P levels of different plant functional groups (e.g., monocots and dicots) respond to environmental gradients in a generalizable pattern. Here, we used a global database of leaf N and P to determine whether monocots and dicots might have evolved contrasting strategies to balance N and P in response to changes in climate and soil nutrient availability. Specifically, we characterized global patterns of leaf N, P and N/P ratio in monocots and dicots, and explored the sensitivity of stoichiometry to environment factors in these plants. Our results indicate that leaf N and P levels responded to environmental factors differently in monocots than in dicots. In dicots, variations of leaf N, P and N/P ratio were significantly correlated to temperature and precipitation. In monocots, leaf N/P ratio was not significantly affected by temperature or precipitation. This indicates that leaf N, P and N/P ratio are less sensitive to environmental dynamics in monocots. We also found that in both monocots and dicots N/P ratios are associated with the availability of soil total P rather than soil total N, indicating that P limitation on plant growth is pervasive globally. In addition, there were significant phylogenetic signals for leaf N (λ = 0.65), P (λ = 0.57) and N/P ratio (λ = 0.46) in dicots, however, only significant phylogenetic signals for leaf P in monocots. Taken together, our findings indicate that monocots exhibit a "conservative" strategy (high stoichiometric homeostasis and weak phylogenetic signals in stoichiometry) to maintain their growth in stressful conditions with lower water and soil nutrients. In contrast, dicots exhibit lower stoichiometric homeostasis in changing environments because of their wide climate-soil niches and significant phylogenetic signals in stoichiometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.