Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811723›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Using the Regression Slope of Training Loss to Optimize Chest X-ray Generation in Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks.

Chih-Hsiung Chen, Kuang-Yu Hsieh, Kuo-En Huang, En-Tsung Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chih-Hsiung ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mennonite Christian Hospital, Hualien, TWN.
Kuang-Yu HsiehDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mennonite Christian Hospital, Hualien, TWN.
Kuo-En HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mennonite Christian Hospital, Hualien, TWN.
En-Tsung ChengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jen Ho Hospital, Show Chwan Health Care System, Changhua, TWN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion models, variational autoencoders, and generative adversarial networks (GANs) are three common types of generative artificial intelligence models for image generation. Among these, GANs are the most frequently used for medical image generation and are often employed for data augmentation in various studies. However, due to the adversarial nature of GANs, where the generator and discriminator compete against each other, the training process can sometimes end with the model unable to generate meaningful images or even producing noise. This phenomenon is rarely discussed in the literature, and no studies have proposed solutions to address this issue. Such outcomes can introduce significant bias when GANs are used for data augmentation in medical image training. Moreover, GANs often require substantial computational power and storage, adding to the challenges. In this study, we used deep convolutional GANs for chest X-ray generation, and three typical training outcomes were found. Two scenarios generated meaningful medical images and one failed to produce usable images. By analyzing the loss history during training, we observed that the regression line of the overall losses tends to diverge slowly. After excluding outlier losses, we found that the slope of the regression line within the stable loss segment indicates the optimal point to terminate training, ensuring the generation of meaningful medical images.

Indexed as

chest x-raydeep convolutional generative adversarial networksgenerative artificial intelligenceimage generationregression lineslope

Identifiers

PMID39811723
PMCPMC11730489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.