ArticleVeterinary and animal science2025
Bayesian predictive modelling to ascertain factors affecting cattle milk production in Tanzania: Evidence from the national panel surveys 2012 - 2021.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate and compare Bayesian predictive models to identify and quantify the key household inputs affecting cattle milk production in Tanzania. A sample of 1,266 households with at least one milked cow was extracted from the National Panel Survey datasets, the data were collected in 2012/2013 (wave 3), 2014/2015 (wave 4), and 2020/2021 (wave 5). Two generalized linear and generalized additive mixed models were fitted using the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation. The fitted models were evaluated by using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Deviance Information Criteria (DIC), and Watanabe Information Criteria (WAIC). The findings indicate that the generalized linear mixed model with a gamma distribution performed best, as it balanced good fit and predictive performance (RMSE=1.47, DIC=5,061.36, and WAIC=5,079.45). Although the generalized additive mixed model with a gamma distribution had a better fit (DIC=5,006.54 and WAIC=5,074.43), it had a higher RMSE (1.89), making it less suitable for prediction. The study identified that household inputs, such as major feeding practices, person-administered tick treatment, and total labour cost significantly affect cattle milk production, as their 95% credible intervals did not include zero. In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights into the relationship between milk production and household inputs while incorporating prior knowledge about the parameters into the analysis and considering mixed effects models. The study's insights into significant household inputs can guide dairy farmers and policymakers in optimising milk production practices by focusing on key variables such as feeding practices, health management, and labour costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.