ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
Frontal plane mechanical leg alignment estimation from knee x-rays using deep learning.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Lower limb malalignment can complicate symptoms and accelerate knee osteoarthritis (OA), necessitating consideration in study population selection. In this study, we develop and validate a deep learning model that classifies leg alignment as "normal" or "malaligned" from knee antero-posterior (AP)/postero-anterior (PA) radiographs alone, using an adjustable hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle threshold. Material and methods: We utilized 8878 digital radiographs, including 6181 AP/PA full-leg x-rays (LLRs) and 2697 AP/PA knee x-rays (2292 with positioning frame, 405 without). The model's evaluation involved two steps: In step 1, the model's predictions on knee images cropped from LLRs were compared against the ground truth from the original LLRs. In step 2, the model was tested on knee AP radiographs, using corresponding same-day LLRs as a proxy for ground truth. Results: The model effectively classified alignment, with step one achieving sensitivity and specificity of 0.92 for a threshold of 7.5°, and 0.90 and 0.85 for 5°. For positioning frame images, step two showed a sensitivity of 0.85 and specificity of 0.81 for 7.5°, and 0.79 and 0.74 for 5°. For non-positioning frame images, sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 and 0.83 for 7.5°, and 0.9 and 0.86 for 5°. Conclusion: The model developed in this study accurately classifies lower limb malalignment from AP/PA knee radiographs using adjustable thresholds, offering a practical alternative to LLRs. This can enhance the precision of study population selection and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.