ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2025
Ribosome profiling shows variable sensitivity to detect open reading frames for conventional and different types of cryptic T cell antigens.
Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- ImmunoNX: a robust bioinformatics workflow to support personalized neoantigen vaccine trials.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T cell-based immunotherapies targeting antigens on tumor cells have shown efficacy as anti-cancer treatments. While neoantigens are created by somatic mutations acquired during tumorigenesis, allogeneic stem cell transplantation as treatment for hematological malignancies exploits minor histocompatibility antigens encoded by genetic differences between patients and donors. Screening methods to predict neoantigens and minor histocompatibility antigens typically consider only conventional antigens created by nonsynonymous mutations or polymorphisms coding for amino acid changes in canonical open reading frames (ORFs). However, unconventional ORFs encoding peptides outside the known human proteome also provide an important source of cryptic antigens targeted in anti-tumor responses. Here, we used the recently expanded repertoire of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I-restricted minor histocompatibility antigens identified in patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation by a method unbiased regarding the type of antigen to explore the sensitivity of ribosome profiling to detect ORFs for different types of T cell antigens. Ribosome profiling showed high sensitivity to detect upstream ORFs for cryptic antigens similar to canonical ORFs for conventional antigens, while cryptic antigens in out-of-frame ORFs and ORFs in long non-coding RNAs were largely missed. In conclusion, ribosome profiling shows variable sensitivity to detect ORFs for canonical and different types of cryptic T cell antigens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.