Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811688›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2025

Ribosome profiling shows variable sensitivity to detect open reading frames for conventional and different types of cryptic T cell antigens.

Kyra J Fuchs, Sofia Thomaidou, Arno R van der Slik, Marian van de Meent, Peter A C 't Hoen, J H Frederik Falkenburg, Arnaud Zaldumbide, Marieke Griffioen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kyra J FuchsDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sofia ThomaidouDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Arno R van der SlikDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marian van de MeentDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Peter A C 't HoenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J H Frederik FalkenburgDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Arnaud ZaldumbideDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marieke GriffioenDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cell-based immunotherapies targeting antigens on tumor cells have shown efficacy as anti-cancer treatments. While neoantigens are created by somatic mutations acquired during tumorigenesis, allogeneic stem cell transplantation as treatment for hematological malignancies exploits minor histocompatibility antigens encoded by genetic differences between patients and donors. Screening methods to predict neoantigens and minor histocompatibility antigens typically consider only conventional antigens created by nonsynonymous mutations or polymorphisms coding for amino acid changes in canonical open reading frames (ORFs). However, unconventional ORFs encoding peptides outside the known human proteome also provide an important source of cryptic antigens targeted in anti-tumor responses. Here, we used the recently expanded repertoire of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I-restricted minor histocompatibility antigens identified in patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation by a method unbiased regarding the type of antigen to explore the sensitivity of ribosome profiling to detect ORFs for different types of T cell antigens. Ribosome profiling showed high sensitivity to detect upstream ORFs for cryptic antigens similar to canonical ORFs for conventional antigens, while cryptic antigens in out-of-frame ORFs and ORFs in long non-coding RNAs were largely missed. In conclusion, ribosome profiling shows variable sensitivity to detect ORFs for canonical and different types of cryptic T cell antigens.

Indexed as

cancer immunologycryptic antigenminor histocompatibility antigenribosome profilingT cell antigen

Identifiers

PMID39811688
PMCPMC11731205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.