Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811674›Full record

ArticleGastro hep advances2025

Alcohol Relapse After Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors, Outcomes, and a Comparison of Risk Stratification Models.

Karen Young, Yuval A Patel, Benson Hoffman, Sarah Peskoe, Shein-Chung Chow, Karli Erhart, Jennifer Jackson, Stephanie Garbarino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastro hep advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gender disparity in access to early liver transplant among patients with alcohol associated liver disease and limited sobriety is mediated by psychosocial factors.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen YoungDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Yuval A PatelDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Borland Groover, Saint Johns, Florida.
Benson HoffmanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah PeskoeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Shein-Chung ChowDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Karli ErhartDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer JacksonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Stephanie GarbarinoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Alcohol-related liver disease is a leading cause of liver transplantation (LT) in the United States; however, alcohol relapse remains a risk, and real-world assessment of relapse prediction scores is lacking. The primary aim of this study was to assess risk factors for alcohol relapse and compare effectiveness of pre-existing risk scores (e.g., Sustained Alcohol Use Post-Liver Transplant (SALT) and Harmful Alcohol Use Post-Liver Transplant (HALT) scores). Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of 69 adults who underwent LT for alcohol-related liver disease at Duke University Hospital from January 1, 2018, to January 1, 2021. Outcome variables included relapse post-LT, severity of relapse, and graft dysfunction. Results: Sixty-seven patients with a median follow-up time of 43 months were included. Eighteen (27%) experienced alcohol relapse. Of those, 16 (89%) had heavy alcohol use and 3 of those patients (17%) experienced graft dysfunction. Factors significantly associated with relapse included younger age, prior relapse, significant psychiatric comorbidities, alcohol use after cirrhosis diagnosis, shorter abstinence before LT listing, and prior alcohol treatment program. When applying SALT and HALT scores, the area under the curve was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.85) and 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.50-0.81), respectively. Conclusion: In our cohort, heavy alcohol use before transplantation and legal issues did not predict relapse, which are common components of prediction scores. Less than 5% of patients had graft dysfunction due to relapse, suggesting good graft outcomes. While the HALT and SALT scores were validated in our cohort, our finding of additional significant predictors of relapse, in addition to previously reported risk factors providing protective effect, suggests opportunity for further optimization of prediction scores.

Indexed as

Alcohol-Related Liver DiseasesAlcohol Use DisorderCirrhosisSecondary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID39811674
PMCPMC11731465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.