Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811666›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

The development of social attention in orangutans: Comparing peering behavior in wild and zoo-housed individuals.

Paulina Kukofka, Richard Young, Julia A Kunz, Lara Nellissen, Shauhin E Alavi, Tri Rahmaeti, Fitriah Basalamah, Daniel B M Haun, Caroline Schuppli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Brokering peace in the ape (culture) wars.Evolutionary human sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paulina KukofkaDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
Richard YoungDevelopment and Evolution of Cognition Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Bücklestraße 5 78467 Konstanz, Germany.
Julia A KunzDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstraße 190 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Lara NellissenDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstraße 190 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Shauhin E AlaviDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
Tri RahmaetiFakultas Biologi, Universitas Nasional, Jalan Sawo Manila, RT.14/RW.3, Jakarta 12550, Indonesia.
Fitriah BasalamahFakultas Biologi, Universitas Nasional, Jalan Sawo Manila, RT.14/RW.3, Jakarta 12550, Indonesia.
Daniel B M HaunDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Caroline SchuppliDevelopment and Evolution of Cognition Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Bücklestraße 5 78467 Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social learning plays an essential role in all cultural processes, but the factors underlying its evolution remain poorly understood. To understand how socio-ecological conditions affect social learning, we compared peering behavior (i.e., close-range observation of conspecifics' activities) in wild and zoo-housed Sumatran orangutans. Using long-term data describing over 3,000 peering events (performed by 65 individuals across settings), we found similar age trajectories of peering in both settings. Moreover, immatures universally preferred to peer at older individuals and in learning-intense contexts. However, zoo-housed immatures peered more frequently, and more at non-mother individuals than their wild conspecifics, even when social opportunities were controlled for. Therefore, although similarities across settings suggest that the tendency to attend to social information has hard-wired components, the differences indicate that it is also influenced by social opportunities and the necessity to learn. Our comparative approach thus provides evidence that socio-ecological factors and genetic predispositions underlie the dynamics and evolution of culture.

Indexed as

Evolutionary biologyWildlife behaviorZoo animal behavior

Identifiers

PMID39811666
PMCPMC11732129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.