ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Enhancing detection of previously missed non-palpable breast carcinomas through artificial intelligence.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Terahertz Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection in Animal Models: A Literature Review with Narrative Synthesis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection with Different Modalities: Mammography, Ultrasound, and Thermography Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) reading digital mammograms in increasing the chance of detecting missed breast cancer, by studying the AI- flagged early morphology indictors, overlooked by the radiologist, and correlating them with the missed cancer pathology types. Methods and materials: Mammograms done in 2020-2023, presenting breast carcinomas (n = 1998), were analyzed in concordance with the prior one year's result (2019-2022) assumed negative or benign. Present mammograms reviewed for the descriptors: asymmetry, distortion, mass, and microcalcifications. The AI presented abnormalities by overlaying color hue and scoring percentage for the degree of suspicion of malignancy. Results: Prior mammogram with AI marking compromised 54 % (n = 555), and in the present mammograms, AI targeted 904 (88 %) carcinomas. The descriptor proportion of "asymmetry" was the common presentation of missed breast carcinoma (64.1 %) in the prior mammograms and the highest detection rate for AI was presented by "distortion" (100 %) followed by "grouped microcalcifications" (80 %). AI performance to predict malignancy in previously assigned negative or benign mammograms showed sensitivity of 73.4 %, specificity of 89 %, and accuracy of 78.4 %. Conclusions: Reading mammograms with AI significantly enhances the detection of early cancerous changes, particularly in dense breast tissues. The AI's detection rate does not correlate with specific pathological types of breast cancer, highlighting its broad utility. Subtle mammographic changes in postmenopausal women, not corroborated by ultrasound but marked by AI, warrant further evaluation by advanced applications of digital mammograms and close interval AI-reading mammogram follow up to minimize the potential for missed breast carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.