ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
Validating and utilizing dried blood spots for family screening: Screening Programme Providing Outreach for Testing Hereditary Angioedema (SPPOT-HAE).
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- International Guideline on the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Patients With Hereditary Angioedema.Allergy · 2026Guideline
- Beyond the Index Case: A Practical Framework for Cascade Family Screening in Hereditary Angioedema.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- From guidelines to global impact: updates to address disparities in hereditary angioedema care.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Article
- Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) in China: Advancing Awareness, Access, Advocacy and Alliances From the Greater Bay Area to the Global HAE Community.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Review
- Evaluating functional C1INH with multiple laboratory methods across Hereditary Angioedema types.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder with potentially life-threatening consequences, traditionally diagnosed by conventional laboratory methods that can be resource intensive and inconvenient. Incorporating dried blood spot (DBS) tests may be a promising alternative for diagnosing HAE and family screening. Objective: This study aimed to validate DBS with conventional laboratory assays among confirmed C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) HAE patients and assess the utility of DBS in a Screening Programme Providing Outreach for Testing Hereditary Angioedema (SPPOT-HAE). Methods: In part 1, 16 Chinese C1-INH-HAE patients from 7 families participated in the validation of DBS for detecting C4, C1-INH, and functional C1-INH (fC1-INH). The results were compared with conventional laboratory assays. In part 2, DBS was utilized in family screening for HAE in a large Chinese family with relatives previously refusing testing. Results: The study found strong correlation between conventional assays and DBS in measuring C4 ( Conclusion: This is the first study to validate measurement of fC1-INH using DBS in C1-INH-HAE with conventional assays. An outreach program using DBS is a promising strategy overcoming previous barriers of family screening. Further large-scale, multicenter studies are required to establish the role of DBS, compare cost-effectiveness with prior strategies, and maximize diagnosis in resource-constrained countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.