ArticleData in brief2025
A comprehensive image dataset for the identification of lemon leaf diseases and computer vision applications.
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid convolution and attention-based framework with visual explanation for fruit disease identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Precision diagnosis of citrus leaf diseases using image enhancement and nonlinear fuzzy ranking ensemble approach NLFuRBe.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive image dataset for accurate diagnosis of betel leaf diseases using artificial intelligence in plant pathology.Data in brief · 2025Article
- A data-driven approach to turmeric disease detection: Dataset for plant condition classification.Data in brief · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comprehensive dataset on lemon leaf disease can surely bring a lot of potentials into the development of agricultural research and the improvement of disease management strategies. This dataset was developed from 1354 raw images taken with professional agricultural specialist guidance from July to September 2024 in Charpolisha, Jamalpur, and further enhanced with augmented techniques, adding 9000 images. The augmentation process involves a set of techniques-flipping, rotation, zooming, shifting, adding noise, shearing, and brightening-to increase variety for different lemon leaf condition representations. Each of these images was standardized to 800 × 800 pixels resolution, so that consistency may be maintained among the dataset. All images were labelled in the nine prefixed categories: anthracnose, bacterial blight, citrus canker, curl virus, deficiency leaf, dry leaf, healthy leaf, sooty mould, and spider mites. In the present study, a DenseNet-121 architecture was used, where 20 % of the dataset was kept for validation and the remaining 80 % for training. A trained model with a batch size of 32 was trained for 30 epochs, achieving an accuracy of 98.56 % with augmentation, and 96.19 % without it. The dataset will not only act as a benchmark in developing accurate machine learning models for early disease detection, but it will also contribute to the cause of sustainable lemon cultivation practices by facilitating timely and effective disease management interventions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.