Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811499›Full record

ReviewBJA open2025

Environmental impact of commonly used anaesthetic agents: systematic literature review with narrative synthesis.

Philippa Lloyd, Alexander J Fowler, Anna Wozniak, William Rattenberry, Sara Scott, Vikas Tripurneni, Mark Earl, Rupert M Pearse, Sarah-Louise Watson, Tom E F Abbott and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Exploring sevoflurane consumption and COJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Philippa LloydBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Alexander J FowlerWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Anna WozniakAdult Critical Care Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
William RattenberryDepartment of Anaesthesia, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK.
Sara ScottDepartment of Anaesthesia, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK.
Vikas TripurneniDepartment of Anaesthesia, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mark EarlDepartment of Anaesthesia, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rupert M PearseWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Sarah-Louise WatsonBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Tom E F AbbottWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Sarah HareDepartment of Anaesthesia, The William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increasing awareness of the potential environmental impact of volatile anaesthetic agents has stimulated increased use of total i.v. anaesthesia. However, consolidated comparative evidence of the environmental impact of anaesthetic agents across the whole life cycle is lacking. Methods: We performed a systematic review and narrative evidence synthesis of the environmental impact of anaesthetic agents stratified by drug life cycle. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature (CINAHL), and DrugBank, from inception until 05 March 2023, for studies describing the environmental impact of anaesthetic drugs on the WHO essential medicine list. Independent review and data extraction were performed by pairs of reviewers. Data on any aspect of cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis were reported, with narrative synthesis grouped according to life cycle domains. Results: From 15 229 records, 42 unique reports met our inclusion criteria. The predominant environmental impact of inhalation anaesthetic agents is atmospheric release, contributing to global warming. This may be improved with the emergence of more efficacious scavenging and capture systems. Packaging and waste contributed most to the environmental impact of i.v. anaesthetic agents. There is increasing concern over the ecological impact of i.v. agents entering water sources, either by disposal of unused medication or through the excretion of drug post-administration. Conclusions: There is increasing concern about the global warming impact of inhalation anaesthetic agents. However, there are insufficient 'cradle-to-grave' comparative analyses of the environmental impact of i.v. and inhalation anaesthesia to form evidence-based conclusions. Further research is urgently needed to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

anaestheticsdesfluraneenvironmental impactinhaledintravenouslife cycle analysispropofolsevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID39811499
PMCPMC11732243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.