ReviewBJA open2025
Environmental impact of commonly used anaesthetic agents: systematic literature review with narrative synthesis.
Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 0.00015 degree problem: learning from the environmental debates around desflurane.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Environmental and clinical rationale for the use of desflurane: a review of the literature.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Review
- Exploring sevoflurane consumption and COJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Developments in nitrous oxide capture technologies: bridging current research to clinical applications.Anaesthesia · 2026Review
- Volatile Anesthesia in Contemporary Cardiac Surgery: Clinical Implications, Organ Protection and Perspectives for Personalized Perioperative Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Recycling and Environmental Sustainability in Anesthesia Practice: Beyond Low‑Flow Anesthesia.Cureus · 2026Review
- Environmental harm from anaesthesia: the importance of clinical realism and chemical persistence.BJA open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Increasing awareness of the potential environmental impact of volatile anaesthetic agents has stimulated increased use of total i.v. anaesthesia. However, consolidated comparative evidence of the environmental impact of anaesthetic agents across the whole life cycle is lacking. Methods: We performed a systematic review and narrative evidence synthesis of the environmental impact of anaesthetic agents stratified by drug life cycle. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature (CINAHL), and DrugBank, from inception until 05 March 2023, for studies describing the environmental impact of anaesthetic drugs on the WHO essential medicine list. Independent review and data extraction were performed by pairs of reviewers. Data on any aspect of cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis were reported, with narrative synthesis grouped according to life cycle domains. Results: From 15 229 records, 42 unique reports met our inclusion criteria. The predominant environmental impact of inhalation anaesthetic agents is atmospheric release, contributing to global warming. This may be improved with the emergence of more efficacious scavenging and capture systems. Packaging and waste contributed most to the environmental impact of i.v. anaesthetic agents. There is increasing concern over the ecological impact of i.v. agents entering water sources, either by disposal of unused medication or through the excretion of drug post-administration. Conclusions: There is increasing concern about the global warming impact of inhalation anaesthetic agents. However, there are insufficient 'cradle-to-grave' comparative analyses of the environmental impact of i.v. and inhalation anaesthesia to form evidence-based conclusions. Further research is urgently needed to guide clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.