Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811423›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunotherapy and precision oncology2025

Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Single Institution Experience.

Tony Z Zhuang, Subir Goyal, Katherine B Case, T Anders Olsen, Shalini Vemuru, Ahmet Yildirim, Rohit V Goswamy, Jacqueline T Brown, Bradley C Carthon, Omer Kucuk and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tony Z ZhuangDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-4629
Subir GoyalBiostatistics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Katherine B CaseDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
T Anders OlsenDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Shalini VemuruDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ahmet YildirimDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rohit V GoswamyDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jacqueline T BrownDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bradley C CarthonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Omer KucukDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mehmet Asim BilenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Viraj A MasterDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bassel NazhaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and an unmet need for biomarkers. We performed a retrospective evaluation of real-world efficacy, safety outcomes, and baseline inflammatory biomarkers in patients with advanced pSCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with advanced pSCC who received ICIs from 2012 to 2023 at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, GA. Demographics, disease characteristics, and optimal cutoffs of baseline biomarkers obtained before ICI initiation were described. Human papillomavirus (HPV)/p16+ status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity was defined as >1%. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria and captured through clinical documentation. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and univariate Cox regression (UVA) using a significance level set at Results: Twenty-one patients were included of whom 71.4% were White and 28.6% were Black. Median age at ICI initiation was 56 years (38-76 years). Most patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (61.9%). At diagnosis, 4.8%, 33.3%, and 61.9% were stage 2, 3, and 4, respectively, of whom eight patients had initial distal metastases. Of patients with available data, 7 of 11 patients (63.6%) were PD-L1+ and 8 of 9 (89%) patients were HPV+. Median follow-up was 8.4 months and median time to ICI treatment from diagnosis was 15.6 months. ICI was first line (1L) in 1 patient (4.8%), 2L in 13 (61.9%), 3L in 6 (28.6%), and 4L in 1 (4.8%). Five patients achieved clinical benefit of whom three had partial response and two had stable disease. Median OS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 2.3-15.7) and PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.3-3.2). Notably, three patients with PD-L1 positivity, microsatellite instability (MSI)-high, or high tumor mutational burden (TMB) demonstrated response to ICI. Higher baseline NLR (hazard ratio, 10.0; 95% CI, 2.73-54.2) at optimal cutoff was associated with shorter OS and PFS on UVA. Three patients (14.3%) developed grade 3/4 ICI-related adverse events. Conclusions: Our real-world analysis summarizes our institutional experience and provides granular clinical and molecular attributes of patients with therapeutic response, which may aid in patient stratification within ICI-based clinical trials. Overall, we confirm poor response rates of pSCC to ICI in an unselected approach, consistent with multicenter studies. ICIs may be effective and tolerable therapy in a subset of patients. NLR may be a potential biomarker to assess ICI response in pSCC.

Indexed as

biomarkerimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunotherapynivolumabpembrolizumabpenile squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39811423
PMCPMC11728382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.