ArticleJournal of immunotherapy and precision oncology2025
Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Single Institution Experience.
Article in Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for prognostication in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated cancer patients: a meta-analysis of 13027 patients highlighting nivolumab-responsive renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- The predictive value of the neutrophil/eosinophil ratio in cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibition: a meta-analysis and a validation cohort in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- B lymphocytes and tertiary lymphoid structures have a prognostic impact on penile squamous cell carcinoma.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2025Article
- Association of peripheral-blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio withJournal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and an unmet need for biomarkers. We performed a retrospective evaluation of real-world efficacy, safety outcomes, and baseline inflammatory biomarkers in patients with advanced pSCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with advanced pSCC who received ICIs from 2012 to 2023 at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, GA. Demographics, disease characteristics, and optimal cutoffs of baseline biomarkers obtained before ICI initiation were described. Human papillomavirus (HPV)/p16+ status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity was defined as >1%. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria and captured through clinical documentation. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and univariate Cox regression (UVA) using a significance level set at Results: Twenty-one patients were included of whom 71.4% were White and 28.6% were Black. Median age at ICI initiation was 56 years (38-76 years). Most patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (61.9%). At diagnosis, 4.8%, 33.3%, and 61.9% were stage 2, 3, and 4, respectively, of whom eight patients had initial distal metastases. Of patients with available data, 7 of 11 patients (63.6%) were PD-L1+ and 8 of 9 (89%) patients were HPV+. Median follow-up was 8.4 months and median time to ICI treatment from diagnosis was 15.6 months. ICI was first line (1L) in 1 patient (4.8%), 2L in 13 (61.9%), 3L in 6 (28.6%), and 4L in 1 (4.8%). Five patients achieved clinical benefit of whom three had partial response and two had stable disease. Median OS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 2.3-15.7) and PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.3-3.2). Notably, three patients with PD-L1 positivity, microsatellite instability (MSI)-high, or high tumor mutational burden (TMB) demonstrated response to ICI. Higher baseline NLR (hazard ratio, 10.0; 95% CI, 2.73-54.2) at optimal cutoff was associated with shorter OS and PFS on UVA. Three patients (14.3%) developed grade 3/4 ICI-related adverse events. Conclusions: Our real-world analysis summarizes our institutional experience and provides granular clinical and molecular attributes of patients with therapeutic response, which may aid in patient stratification within ICI-based clinical trials. Overall, we confirm poor response rates of pSCC to ICI in an unselected approach, consistent with multicenter studies. ICIs may be effective and tolerable therapy in a subset of patients. NLR may be a potential biomarker to assess ICI response in pSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.