ArticleHeliyon2025
Evaluation of the association between bevacizumab concentration and clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer brain metastasis.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bevacizumab is widely used in various clinical indications, but investigations into its optimal dosage for treating CNS metastases remain limited. The BEEP regimen, comprising bevacizumab, etoposide, and cisplatin, has recently demonstrated promising clinical outcomes for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) or leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). This study aimed to evaluate the exposure-response relationship of bevacizumab in BCBM patients and to explore the improved CNS penetration of chemotherapy by bevacizumab with LM patients. Twenty-two BCBM patients and six LM patients receiving the BEEP regimen were enrolled. For BCBM patients, blood samples were drawn at trough level of cycles 1 and 6 to investigate the association between bevacizumab concentrations and clinical outcomes. For LM patients, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of bevacizumab and etoposide were measured to investigate the enhancement of etoposide penetration provided by bevacizumab. Concentration evaluation revealed that bevacizumab plasma concentrations substantially varied between individuals. Additionally, concentrations increased after 6 cycles, indicating bevacizumab accumulation during treatment. Although bevacizumab concentrations did not associate with therapeutic response and progression-free survival, patients with higher bevacizumab concentrations exhibited longer overall survival (adjusted HR 0.78; p = 0.039). Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between time-weighted average concentration of plasma bevacizumab and CSF penetration of etoposide on day 2 (post-bevacizumab) relative to day 1 (pre-bevacizumab) (r = 0.83; p = 0.042). These findings offer valuable insights into the application of therapeutic drug monitoring of bevacizumab to improve survival outcomes in BCBM patients. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal bevacizumab concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.