ArticleHeliyon2025
Altered circadian rhythmicity of the QT interval predicts mortality in a large real-world academic hospital population.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circadian rhythms in cardiovascular disease.European heart journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective and rationale: Small studies have shown that the QT interval follows a circadian rhythm. This finding has never been confirmed in a large real-world hospital population and the clinical meaning of disrupted rhythmicity remains unknown. Methods: In this cohort study, all consecutive adult patients with at least one 12-lead ECG acquired between 1991 and 2021 were considered. Sinus rhythm ECGs without QRS conduction or ST-segment abnormalities obtained at the wards or outpatient clinic were included. The QT interval was corrected for age, sex and ventricular rate in a personalized manner. Subsequently, the added value of a 24-h sinusoid of time-of-day was evaluated. An individual 24-h QT interval amplitude was obtained from the model in a subset with patients that had at least 3 ECGs of which one during the night before their last ECG. The association of this individual QT interval with all-cause mortality was assessed using a left-truncated Cox regression model. Results: The baseline QT correction model was fitted using 237,555 ECGs of 100,644 patients. The personalized corrected QT interval had no relationship with ventricular rate ( Conclusions: Using heterogeneous, real-world hospital data of more than 100,000 patients, circadian rhythmicity proved to be an independent determinant of the QT interval. Both increased and diminished QT rhythmicity was shown to be a predictor of all-cause mortality. QT interval should be corrected for the time-of-day and altered circadian rhythmicity should trigger awareness of increased mortality risk (https://qt.ecgx.ai).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.