ArticleHeliyon2025
Optimal sandwich panel's core design for an enhanced impact resistance.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the extensive literature revealing various core structures that can enhance the impact resistance of composite panels, a comparative study illustrating the difference in performance of the various cores under same loading conditions is missing. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal core structure and design in terms of energy absorption under low-velocity impact using both numerical simulations and experimental testing for validation. Response surface analysis was used to design the experiments and analyse the panel's behaviour. A total of 160 numerical simulations were conducted by varying the core shape, density, number of layers and panel's thickness. Drop tower tests were performed to experimentally validate the results. Additive manufacturing was used to 3D print the tested structures which simplified the manufacturing process. Results provided insights on time to perforation, stiffness of the panels showcasing an inverse relationship between recoverable strain energy and equivalent plastic strain. The number of layers within the panels were identified as a pivotal factor in the energy distribution and tendency for localized plastic deformation to occur. Both numerical and experimental results revealed the superior energy absorption capabilities of the X-frame core shaped structure. Regression models developed shed light on the relationships between core height, volume fraction, number of layers, and core topology revealing the extent of damage. Multi-objective optimization was used to yield optimal configuration for sandwich panels with highest impact resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.