ArticleHeliyon2025
Parametric optimization and sensitivity analysis of the integrated Taguchi-CRITIC-EDAS method to enhance the surface quality and tensile test behavior of 3D printed PLA and ABS parts.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Cost Analysis and Emerging Applications.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Review
- Predictive modeling and experimental validation of mechanical-microstructural relationships in 3D-printed Onyx-fibre composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A risk-stratified framework for in-house PLA 3D printing of non-critical medical device spare parts: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D printing is a popular and cost-effective method for producing lightweight engineering parts with enhanced characteristics and detailed prototypes. Nevertheless, the quality of the print can be diminished by the selection of improper parameter settings. This investigation explored the impact of printing factors on the tensile behavior of polylactic acid (PLA) and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) specimens. Experimental investigations were conducted to investigate the effects of infill pattern (grid, 2D, and 3D honeycomb), layer thickness (0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 mm), infill percentage (30 %, 50 %, and 70 %), and printing material on surface roughness and tensile characteristics where an irregular dependency was identified. In this scenario, the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) Method was integrated with Taguchi and Criteria Importance through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) to prevent inconsistent judgments with a minimal number of experiments. PLA printed parts with 2D honeycomb design, 0.10 mm layer thickness, and 50 % infill provided the optimum results within the declared boundary conditions. The robustness and sensitivity of the employed MCDM method were assessed through a comprehensive analysis. The weights determined through other techniques, including the equal method, principal component analysis (PCA), and Entropy, were subsequently compared to CRITIC. The results indicated a stronger correlation between PCA and CRITIC. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation matrix results indicated that EDAS was significantly correlated with the MOORA method in comparison to the other methods (ARAS, WASPAS, GRA, COPRAS, and CODAS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.